Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. The Non-Aristotelian Character of Aquinas’s Ethics.Eleonore Stump - 2011 - Faith and Philosophy 28 (1):29-43.
    Scholars discussing Aquinas’s ethics typically understand it as largely Aristotelian, though with some differences accounted for by the differences in world­view between Aristotle and Aquinas. In this paper, I argue against this view. I show that although Aquinas recognizes the Aristotelian virtues, he thinks they are not real virtues. Instead, for Aquinas, the passions—or the suitably formulated intellectual and volitional analogues to the passions—are not only the foundation of any real ethical life but also the flowering of what is best (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  • After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory.Samuel Scheffler - 1983 - Philosophical Review 92 (3):443.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   518 citations  
  • The Person and the Common Good.Lincoln Reis, Jacques Maritain & John J. Fitzgerald - 1949 - Philosophical Review 58 (4):376.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   22 citations  
  • The internal morality of clinical medicine: A paradigm for the ethics of the helping and healing professions.Edmund D. Pellegrino - 2001 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 26 (6):559 – 579.
    The moral authority for professional ethics in medicine customarily rests in some source external to medicine, i.e., a pre-existing philosophical system of ethics or some form of social construction, like consensus or dialogue. Rather, internal morality is grounded in the phenomena of medicine, i.e., in the nature of the clinical encounter between physician and patient. From this, a philosophy of medicine is derived which gives moral force to the duties, virtues and obligations of physicians qua physicians. Similarly, an ethic specific (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   114 citations  
  • Light in the Darkness? Reflections on Eleonore Stump’s Theodicy.William Hasker - 2011 - Faith and Philosophy 28 (4):432-450.
    Eleonore Stump’s Wandering in Darkness: Narrative and the Problem of Suffering is a major contribution to the literature on the problem of evil. This reviewessay summarizes the overall argument of the book, pointing out both merits and difficulties with Stump’s approach. In particular, the essay urges objectionsto the solution she presents for the problem of suffering.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Book Review: Courage as a Christian Virtue. [REVIEW]Rebecca Konyndyk Deyoung - 2013 - Journal of Spiritual Formation and Soul Care 6 (2):301-312.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations