Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. The Two Truths Debate: Tsongkhapa and Gorampa on the Middle Way.Sonam Thakchoe - 2007 - Wisdom Publications.
    All lineages of Tibetan Buddhism today claim allegiance to the philosophy of the Middle Way, the exposition of emptiness propounded by the second-century Indian master Nagarjuna. But not everyone interprets it the same way. A major faultline runs through Tibetan Buddhism around the interpretation of what are called the two truths-the deceptive truth of conventional appearances and the ultimate truth of emptiness. An understanding of this faultline illuminates the beliefs that separate the Gelug descendents of Tsongkhapa from contemporary Dzogchen and (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  • What Happened to the Third and Fourth Lemmas in Tibet?Tom J. F. Tillemans - 2015 - Journal of Buddhist Philosophy 1:24-38.
    The paper looks at how Tsong kha pa, mKhas grub, and Go rams pa understood the third and fourth lemmas in the tetralemma, “both A and B” and “neither A nor B,” respectively.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • The Context of "Correct Seeing": Truth and Fiction in Tibetan Madhyamaka.Constance Kassor - 2019 - Philosophy East and West 68 (4):1178-1192.
    The Madhyamaka school of Buddhist philosophy is grounded in the theory of the two truths. This theory posits the existence of two levels of reality :1 the conventional truth corresponds to the way that things appear, and the ultimate truth corresponds to the way that things really are. Nāgārjuna, the second-century Indian scholar credited with founding the Madhyamaka tradition, frames the relationship between the two truths as follows: "Without relying on the conventional, the ultimate cannot be demonstrated. Without understanding the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • "How Do Mādhyamikas Think?" Revisited.Tom J. F. Tillemans - 2013 - Philosophy East and West 63 (3):417-425.
    In an article published in 2009 titled "How Do Mādhyamikas Think?" I tried to go some distance with Yasuo Deguchi, Jay Garfield, and Graham Priest (henceforth "DGP") in reading certain Buddhist texts as dialetheist.1 The dialetheism that I saw as plausible for the Prajñāpāramitā-sūtras and Nāgārjuna was not the full-blown robust variety of DGP (i.e., acceptance of the truth of some statement of the form p & ¬p) but a non-adjunctive variety, acceptance of p and acceptance of ¬p. In short, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Those Concepts Proliferate Everywhere: A Response to Constance Kassor.Yasuo Deguchi, Jay L. Garfield & Graham Priest - 2013 - Philosophy East and West 63 (3):411-416.
    In this issue, Constance Kassor describes Gorampa's attitude to contradictions as they occur in various contexts of Buddhist pursuit. We agree with much of what she says; with some things we do not.First, some preliminary comments, and a fundamental disagreement. Kassor says:Based on . . . [the assumption that Nāgārjuna has a coherent system of thought] one must resolve apparent contradictions in Nāgārjuna's texts in order to maintain the coherency of his logic. The problem with contradictions is that if they (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Other-Emptiness in the Jonang School: The Theo-logic of Buddhist Dualism.Douglas S. Duckworth - 2015 - Philosophy East and West 65 (2):485-497.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation