Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Why did Einstein's programme supersede lorentz's? (I).Elie Zahar - 1973 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 24 (2):95-123.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   154 citations  
  • Against Method.P. Feyerabend - 1975 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 26 (4):331-342.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   600 citations  
  • History of Science and Its Rational Reconstructions.Imre Lakatos - 1970 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1970:91-136.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   231 citations  
  • Deductive-Nomological vs. Statistical Explanation.G. Hempel, H. Feigl & G. Marxwell - 1967 - Critica 1 (3):120-127.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   24 citations  
  • The Plausibility of Research Programs.Arthur B. Millman - 1976 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1976:140 - 148.
    Although, when first introduced, Copernicus's theory considered as a whole was not superior to the Ptolemaic theory according to any of the usual criteria for comparing theories and determining their acceptability, it did have features which provided the early Copernicans with good reasons for entertaining it and trying to develop it further. These features are discussed and then three plausibility considerations which seem to be operative in this case are formulated.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations