Switch to: Citations

References in:

Mrs Pretty and Ms B

Journal of Medical Ethics 28 (4):211-212 (2002)

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Grasping the nettle--what to do when patients withdraw their consent for treatment: (a clinical perspective on the case of Ms B).M. G. Tweeddale - 2002 - Journal of Medical Ethics 28 (4):236-237.
    Withdrawal of active treatment is common in medical practice, especially in critical care medicine. Usually, however, it involves patients who are unable to take part in the decision making process. As the case of Ms B shows, doctors are sometimes reluctant to withdraw active treatment when the patient is awake and requesting such a course of action. In theory, having a competent patient should facilitate clinical decision making, so where does the problem arise? It is argued that latent medical paternalism (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Ms B and Diane Pretty: a commentary.P. Singer - 2002 - Journal of Medical Ethics 28 (4):234-235.
    In two recent court cases, Ms B, a paralysed competent adult, was allowed to end her life; Mrs Pretty, another paralysed competent adult, was not. In legal terms, the essential difference between the two cases is that Ms B was seeking the withdrawal of treatment, whereas Mrs Pretty was asking for assistance in ending her life. I argue that while this distinction may accurately state the law that governs these situations, it does not rest on a defensible moral basis. Both (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • A disability perspective from the United States on the case of Ms B.D. Coleman - 2002 - Journal of Medical Ethics 28 (4):240-242.
    This article will examine the case of Ms B, a woman with tetraplegia for a year, who, prior to rehabilitation or return to community life, sought a ruling that doctors may turn off her ventilator. The authors are people with disabilities. Their analysis focuses on the manner in which the High Court framed the case in terms of mental capacity, addressed the issue of suicide and ambivalence, and resolved informed consent and treatment alternative issues. While the disability community in the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • (1 other version)Tragic Choices. [REVIEW]Brian Barry - 1984 - Ethics 94 (2):303-318.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   53 citations