Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. The Limited Value of Dementia‐Specific Advance Directives.Rebecca Dresser - 2021 - Hastings Center Report 51 (2):4-5.
    Many people are worried about developing dementia, fearing the losses and burdens that accompany the condition. Dementia‐specific advance directives are intended to address dementia's progressive effects, allowing individuals to express their treatment preferences for different stages of the condition. But enthusiasm for dementia‐specific advance directives should be tempered by recognition of the legal, ethical, and practical issues they raise. Dementia‐specific advance directives are a simplistic response to a complicated situation. Although they enable people to register their future care preferences, in (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Guiding the Future: Rethinking the Role of Advance Directives in the Care of People with Dementia.Barak Gaster & Thaddeus Mason Pope - 2024 - Hastings Center Report 54 (S1):33-39.
    When people lose capacity to make a medical decision, the standard is to assess what their preferences would have been and try to honor their wishes. Dementia raises a special case in such situations, given its long, progressive trajectory during which others must make substituted judgments. The question of how to help surrogates make better‐informed decisions has led to the development of dementia‐specific advance directives, in which people are given tools to help them communicate what their preferences are while they (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Neurologic Diseases and Medical Aid in Dying: Aid-in-Dying Laws Create an Underclass of Patients Based on Disability.Lonny Shavelson, Thaddeus M. Pope, Margaret Pabst Battin, Alicia Ouellette & Benzi Kluger - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (9):5-15.
    Terminally ill patients in 10 states plus Washington, D.C. have the right to take prescribed medications to end their lives (medical aid in dying). But otherwise-eligible patients with neuromuscular disabilities (ALS and other illnesses) are excluded if they are physically unable to “self-administer” the medications without assistance. This exclusion is incompatible with disability rights laws that mandate assistance to provide equal access to health care. This contradiction between aid-in-dying laws and disability rights laws can force patients and clinicians into violating (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   18 citations  
  • Legal briefing: the new Patient Self-Determination Act.Thaddeus Mason Pope - 2013 - Journal of Clinical Ethics 24 (2):156-167.
    This issue’s “Legal Briefing” column covers recent legal developments involving the Patient Self-Determination Act . Enacted in the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court’s Cruzan decision in 1990, the PSDA remains a seminal event in the development of U.S. bioethics public policy, but the PSDA has long been criticized as inadequate and ineffective. Finally, recent legislative and regulatory changes promise to revitalize and rejuvenate it. The PSDA has been the subject of recent articles in The Journal of Clinical Ethics.I categorize (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Opening the Door: Rethinking “Difficult Conversations” about Living and Dying with Dementia.Mara Buchbinder & Nancy Berlinger - 2024 - Hastings Center Report 54 (S1):22-28.
    This essay looks closely at metaphors and other figures of speech that often feature in how Americans talk about dementia, becoming part of cultural narratives: shared stories that convey ideas and values, and also worries and fears. It uses approaches from literary studies to analyze how cultural narratives about dementia may surface in conversations with family members or health care professionals. This essay also draws on research on a notable social effect of legalizing medical aid in dying: patients may find (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Too Soon or Too Late: Rethinking the Significance of Six Months When Dementia Is a Primary Diagnosis.Cindy L. Cain & Timothy E. Quill - 2024 - Hastings Center Report 54 (S1):29-32.
    Cultural narratives shape how we think about the world, including how we decide when the end of life begins. Hospice care has become an integral part of the end‐of‐life care in the United States, but as it has grown, its policies and practices have also imposed cultural narratives, like those associated with the “six‐month rule” that the majority of the end of life takes place in the final six months of life. This idea is embedded in policies for a range (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations