Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Reference and Reflexivity.John Perry - 2001 - Stanford, Calif.: Center for the Study of Language and Inf.
    Following his recently expanded _The Problem of the Essential Indexical and Other Essays,_ John Perry develops a reflexive-referential' account of indexicals, demonstratives and proper names. On these issues the philosophy of language in the twentieth century was shaped by two competing traditions, descriptivist and referentialist. Oddly, the classic referentialist texts of the 1970s by Kripke, Donnellan, Kaplan and others were seemingly refuted almost a century earlier by co-reference and no-reference problems raised by Russell and Frege. Perry's theory, borrowing ideas from (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   209 citations  
  • The Varieties of Reference.Gareth Evans - 1982 - Oxford: Oxford University Press. Edited by John Henry McDowell.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1960 citations  
  • (1 other version)Confusion: A Study in the Theory of Knowledge.Joseph L. Camp - 2002 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
    Everyone has mistaken one thing for another, such as a stranger for an acquaintance. A person who has mistaken two things, Joseph Camp argues, even on a massive scale, is still capable of logical thought. In order to make that idea precise, one needs a logic of confused thought that is blind to the distinction between the objects that have been confused. Confused thought and language cannot be characterized as true or false even though reasoning conducted in such language can (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   25 citations  
  • The Varieties of Reference.Gareth Evans & John Mcdowell - 1986 - Philosophy 61 (238):534-538.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   692 citations  
  • (1 other version)Confusion: a study in the theory of knowledge.Joseph L. Camp - 2002 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
    To attribute confusion to someone is to take up a paternalistic stance in evaluating his reasoning.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   27 citations  
  • Theory change and the indeterminacy of reference.Hartry Field - 1973 - Journal of Philosophy 70 (14):462-481.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   225 citations  
  • Reference and Reflexivity.John Perry - 2009 - Critica 41 (123):147-162.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   220 citations  
  • Précis of Confusion* 1.Joseph L. Camp - 2007 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 74 (3):692-699.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations  
  • (1 other version)Underdetermination and the principles of semantic theory.George Powell - 2002 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 102 (3):271–278.
    Compositionality and semantic innocence seem intuitively plausible constraints on a semantic theory. It has, however, proved notoriously difficult to respect both principles within a single framework. In this paper I argue that their apparent incompatibility derives from an overly-strong formulation of the principles. I propose an alternative weaker formulation which allows for both principles to be respected within a single semantic framework while satisfying the intuitions which motivate the two principles.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Why Attributions of Aboutness Report Soft Facts. Camp - 1988 - Philosophical Topics 16 (1):5-30.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • Introducing substance concepts.Ruth G. Millikan - 2000 - In Ruth Garrett Millikan (ed.), On Clear and Confused Ideas: An Essay About Substance Concepts. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   65 citations  
  • Confused thought and modes of presentation.Krista Lawlor - 2005 - Philosophical Quarterly 55 (218):21-36.
    Ruth Millikan has long argued that the phenomenon of confused thought requires us to abandon certain traditional programmes for mental semantics. On the one hand she argues that confused thought involves confused concepts, and on the other that Fregean senses, or modes of presentation, cannot be useful in theorizing about minds capable of confused thinking. I argue that while we might accept that concepts can be confused, we have no reason to abandon modes of presentation. Making sense of confused thought (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • On Clear and Confused Ideas: An Essay About Substance Concepts.Ruth Garrett Millikan - 2000 - Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Written by one of today's most creative and innovative philosophers, Ruth Garrett Millikan, this book examines basic empirical concepts; how they are acquired, how they function, and how they have been misrepresented in the traditional philosophical literature. Millikan places cognitive psychology in an evolutionary context where human cognition is assumed to be an outgrowth of primitive forms of mentality, and assumed to have 'functions' in the biological sense. Of particular interest are her discussions of the nature of abilities as different (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   208 citations