Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Monism: The Priority of the Whole.Jonathan Schaffer - 2010 - Philosophical Review 119 (1):31-76.
    Consider a circle and a pair of its semicircles. Which is prior, the whole or its parts? Are the semicircles dependent abstractions from their whole, or is the circle a derivative construction from its parts? Now in place of the circle consider the entire cosmos (the ultimate concrete whole), and in place of the pair of semicircles consider the myriad particles (the ultimate concrete parts). Which if either is ultimately prior, the one ultimate whole or its many ultimate parts?
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   677 citations  
  • Does God Have a Nature?Alvin Plantinga - 1980 - Milwaukee: Marquette University Press.
    Sets of contingent objects, perhaps, are as contingent as their members; but properties, propositions, numbers and states of affairs, it seems, are objects whose non-existence is quite impossible. If so, however, how are they related to God? Suppose God has a nature: a property he has essentially that includes each property essential to him. Does God have a nature? And if he does, is there a conflict between God's sovereignty and his having a nature? How is God related to such (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   93 citations  
  • Monism.Jonathan Schaffer - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    This entry focuses on two of the more historically important monisms: existence monism and priority monism . Existence monism targets concrete objects and counts by tokens. This is the doctrine that exactly one concrete object exists. Priority monism also targets concrete objects, but counts by basic tokens. This is the doctrine that exactly one concrete object is basic, which will turn out to be the classical doctrine that the whole is prior to its parts.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   78 citations  
  • The least discerning and most promiscuous truthmaker.Jonathan Schaffer - 2010 - Philosophical Quarterly 60 (239):307 - 324.
    I argue that the one and only truthmaker is the world. This view can be seen as arisingfrom (i) the view that truthmaking is a relation of grounding holding between true propositions and fundamental entities, together with (ii) the view that the world is the one and only fundamental entity. I argue that this view provides an elegant and economical account of the truthmakers, while solving the problem of negative existentials, in a way that proves ontologically revealing.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   158 citations  
  • (1 other version)The nature of truth.Harold Henry Joachim - 1906 - New York,: Greenwood Press. Edited by Simon Blackburn & Keith Simmons.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   23 citations  
  • Divine Contractions: Theism Gives Birth to Idealism.Tyron Goldschmidt & Samuel Lebens - forthcoming - Religious Studies.
    The first part of the paper presents three little arguments from theism to idealism. The second part employs these arguments to make sense of a puzzling doctrine of Jewish mysticism: the doctrine of divine contraction (heb. tzimtzum).
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • Pantheists in Spite of Themselves? God, Infinity, and Three Contemporary Theologians.William Lane Craig - unknown
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • On the Nature of Truth.Bertrand Russell - 1907 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 7 (1):28 - 49.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   72 citations  
  • III.—External and Internal Relations.G. E. Moore - 1920 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 20 (1):40-62.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   47 citations  
  • The Internal Relatedness of All Things.J. Schaffer - 2010 - Mind 119 (474):341-376.
    The argument from internal relatedness was one of the major nineteenth century neo-Hegelian arguments for monism. This argument has been misunderstood, and may even be sound. The argument, as I reconstruct it, proceeds in two stages: first, it is argued that all things are internally related in ways that render them interdependent; second, the substantial unity of the whole universe is inferred from the interdependence of all of its parts. The guiding idea behind the argument is that failure of free (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   111 citations  
  • Does God Have a Nature?William E. Mann - 1982 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 42 (4):625-630.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   36 citations  
  • The Problem of God in Modern Thought.Philip Clayton - 2001 - Ars Disputandi 1.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   18 citations  
  • The Limits of Orthodox Theology: Maimonides' Thirteen Principles Reappraised.Marc B. Shapiro - 2004 - Littman Library of Jewish.
    This book takes issue with the widespread assumption that Maimonides' famous Thirteen Principles are the last word in Orthodox Jewish theology.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Does panentheism reduce to pantheism? A response to Craig.William Rowe - 2007 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 61 (2):65 - 67.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • The Nature of Truth.A. K. Rogers - 1906 - Philosophical Review 15 (6):658.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   17 citations