Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. The brain and somatic integration: Insights into the standard biological rationale for equating brain death with death.D. Alan Shewmon - 2001 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 26 (5):457 – 478.
    The mainstream rationale for equating brain death (BD) with death is that the brain confers integrative unity upon the body, transforming it from a mere collection of organs and tissues to an organism as a whole. In support of this conclusion, the impressive list of the brains myriad integrative functions is often cited. Upon closer examination, and after operational definition of terms, however, one discovers that most integrative functions of the brain are actually not somatically integrating, and, conversely, most integrative (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   160 citations  
  • Brain Death: Can It Be Resuscitated?D. Alan Shewmon - 2009 - Hastings Center Report 39 (2):18-24.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   32 citations  
  • And She's Not Only Merely Dead, She's Really Most Sincerely Dead.Alan Rubenstein, John P. Lizza & Paul T. Menzel - 2009 - Hastings Center Report 39 (5):4-6.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Decapitation and the definition of death.F. G. Miller & R. D. Truog - 2010 - Journal of Medical Ethics 36 (10):632-634.
    Although established in the law and current practice, the determination of death according to neurological criteria continues to be controversial. Some scholars have advocated return to the traditional circulatory and respiratory criteria for determining death because individuals diagnosed as ‘brain dead’ display an extensive range of integrated biological functioning with the aid of mechanical ventilation. Others have attempted to refute this stance by appealing to the analogy between decapitation and brain death. Since a decapitated animal is obviously dead, and ‘brain (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • Commentary on "the incoherence of determining death by neurological criteria".John P. Lizza - 2009 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 19 (4):pp. 393-395.
    This commentary challenges the conclusions reached by Franklin Miller and Robert Truog in their criticism of the President's Council's White Paper, "Controversies in the Determination of Death." I agree with much of Miller and Truog's criticism of the rationale offered by the President's Council for accepting neurological criteria for determining death but argue that they too quickly dismiss the alternative rationale of determining death by neurological criteria-i.e., the destruction of the psychophysical integrity of the human being that occurs when the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations