Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Leibniz and Phenomenalism.Nicholas Jolley - 1986 - Studia Leibnitiana 18 (1):38-51.
    Leibniz est-il devenu phénoménaliste pendant ses années dernières ? Contre Furth et Loeb, ce travail rend une réponse négative à cette question. Quoique Leibniz a caressé les idées phénoménalistes, il ne les a jamais vraiment acceptées ; au contraire, il soutient une autre thèse réductioniste, c'est-à-dire que les corps sont des agrégats des monades. Cependant, cette conclusion entraîne ses propres difficultés, car à certains égards, la doctrine phénoménaliste paraît plus satisfaisante que l'option concurrante. On soutient que la répugnance leibnizienne à (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   17 citations  
  • Phenomenalism and Corporeal Substance in Leibniz.Robert Merrihew Adams - 1983 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 8 (1):217-257.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  • (1 other version)Leibniz and the elements of compound bodies.Pauline Phemister - 1999 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 7 (1):57 – 78.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations  
  • (1 other version)Leibniz and the elements of compound bodies.Pauline Phemister - 2014 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 22 (1):57-78.
    Editor’s Choice for 21st Anniversary Special Edition. Originally published in British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 7(1) (1999), 57-78.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  • Leibniz. [REVIEW]Donald Rutherford - 2000 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 61 (1):226-229.
    Robert Adams’s book has already established itself as a major contribution to the Leibniz literature. It is marked by a rare combination of scholarly and philosophical virtues. Adams knows Leibniz’s texts as well as anyone working today and has an unmatched ability to draw from them novel and penetrating interpretations of Leibniz’s doctrines. In describing the book, Adams declares that it is “not an introduction to Leibniz’s philosophy, nor even a fully comprehensive account of his metaphysics. It is a piece (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   18 citations