Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Four Faces of Fair Subject Selection.Katherine Witte Saylor & Douglas MacKay - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (2):5-19.
    Although the principle of fair subject selection is a widely recognized requirement of ethical clinical research, it often yields conflicting imperatives, thus raising major ethical dilemmas regarding participant selection. In this paper, we diagnose the source of this problem, arguing that the principle of fair subject selection is best understood as a bundle of four distinct sub-principles, each with normative force and each yielding distinct imperatives: (1) fair inclusion; (2) fair burden sharing; (3) fair opportunity; and (4) fair distribution of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   26 citations  
  • Down Girl: The Logic of Misogyny.Kate Manne - 2017 - Oxford University Press.
    Down Girl is a broad, original, and far ranging analysis of what misogyny really is, how it works, its purpose, and how to fight it. The philosopher Kate Manne argues that modern society's failure to recognize women's full humanity and autonomy is not actually the problem. She argues instead that it is women's manifestations of human capacities -- autonomy, agency, political engagement -- is what engenders misogynist hostility.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   167 citations  
  • (1 other version)Ethics and regulation of clinical research.Robert J. Levine - 1986 - Baltimore: Urban & Schwarzenberg.
    In this book, Dr. Robert J. Levine reviews federal regulations, ethical analysis, and case studies in an attempt to answer these questions.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   122 citations  
  • Is Genetic Exceptionalism Past Its Sell-By Date? On Genomic Diaries, Context, and Content.Thomas H. Murray - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (1):13-15.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  • Building a New Consensus: Ethical Principles and Policies for Clinical Research on HIV / AIDS.Carol Levine, Nancy Neveloff Dubler & Robert J. Levine - 1991 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 13 (1/2):194-210.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   17 citations  
  • The second wave: Toward responsible inclusion of pregnant women in research.Anne Drapkin Lyerly, Margaret Olivia Little & Ruth Faden - 2008 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 1 (2):5-22.
    Though much progress has been made on inclusion of non-pregnant women in research, thoughtful discussion about including pregnant women has lagged behind. We outline resulting knowledge gaps and their costs and then highlight four reasons why ethically we are obliged to confront the challenges of including pregnant women in clinical research. These are: the need for effective treatment for women during pregnancy, fetal safety, harm from the reticence to prescribe potentially beneficial medication, and the broader issues of justice and access (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   44 citations  
  • 'Experimental' Pregnancy.Robert M. Veatch - 1971 - Hastings Center Report 1 (1):2-3.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Trust: The Fragile Foundation of Contemporary Biomedical Research.Nancy E. Kass, Jeremy Sugarman, Ruth Faden & Monica Schoch-Spana - 1996 - Hastings Center Report 26 (5):25-29.
    It is widely assumed that informing prospective subjects about the risks and possible benefits of research not only protects their rights as autonomous decisionmakers, but also empowers them to protect their own interests. Yet interviews with patient‐subjects conducted under the auspices of the Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments suggest this is not always the case. Patient‐subjects often trust their physician to guide them through decisions on research participation. Clinicians, investigators, and IRBs must assure that such trust is not misplaced.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   41 citations  
  • Risk and the Pregnant Body.Anne Drapkin Lyerly, Lisa M. Mitchell, Elizabeth Mitchell Armstrong, Lisa H. Harris, Rebecca Kukla, Miriam Kuppermann & Margaret Olivia Little - 2009 - Hastings Center Report 39 (6):34-42.
    Reasoning well about risk is most challenging when a woman is pregnant, for patient and doctor alike. During pregnancy, we tend to note the risks of medical interventions without adequately noting those of failing to intervene, yet when it's time to give birth, interventions are seldom questioned, even when they don't work. Meanwhile, outside the clinic, advice given to pregnant women on how to stay healthy in everyday life can seem capricious and overly cautious. This kind of reasoning reflects fear, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   31 citations  
  • A critique of the 'fetus as patient'.Anne Drapkin Lyerly, Margaret Olivia Little & Ruth R. Faden - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (7):42 – 44.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations  
  • Pregnancy and Protection: the Ethics of Limiting a Pregnant Woman’s Participation in Clinical Trials.Lori Allesee & Colleen M. Gallagher - 2011 - Journal of Clinical Research and Bioethics 2 (2).
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations