Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Public engagement as means of restoring trust in science? Hitting the notes, but missing the music.Brian E. Wynne - 2006 - .
    This paper analyses the recent widespread moves to 'restore' public trust in science by developing an avowedly two-way, public dialogue with science initiatives. Noting how previously discredited and supposedly abandoned public deficit explanations of 'mistrust' have actually been continually reinvented, it argues that this is a symptom of a continuing failure of scientific and policy institutions to place their own science-policy institutional culture into the frame of dialogue, as possible contributory cause of the public mistrust problem.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   57 citations  
  • Different views on ethics: how animal ethics is situated in a committee culture.M. Ideland - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (4):258-261.
    Research that includes non-human animal experimentation is fundamentally a dilemmatic enterprise. Humans use other animals in research to improve life for their own species. Ethical principles are established to deal with this dilemma. But despite this ethical apparatus, people who in one way or another work with animal experimentation have to interpret and understand the principles from their individual points of view. In interviews with members of Swedish animal ethics committees, different views on what the term ethics really means were (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  • Attitudes to research ethical committees.P. Allen & W. E. Waters - 1983 - Journal of Medical Ethics 9 (2):61-65.
    A questionnaire on the attitudes towards the functions of research ethical committees was sent to members of selected research ethical committees in Wessex and some controls. Almost all respondents felt there was a need for ethical review of research projects; 42 per cent thought there was a need for some training before joining a committee; 67 per cent thought the system could be improved and 47 per cent thought that monitoring or follow-up procedures should be adopted. Ethical committees were thought (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations