Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Epicurean Dreams.Voula Tsouna - 2018 - Elenchos: Rivista di Studi Sul Pensiero Antico 39 (2):231-256.
    Most ancient philosophers accept that dreams have prophetic powers enabling humans to relate somehow to a world beyond their own. The only philosophers known to make a clean and explicit break with that tradition are the Epicureans, beginning with Epicurus himself and reaching his last eminent follower, Diogenes of Oinoanda. They openly reject the idea that dreams mediate between the divine and the human realms, or between the world of the living and the world of the dead. They demystify the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • Epicurus. [REVIEW]Cyril Bailey - 1948 - The Classical Review 62 (1):20-21.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  • Epicurus'doctrine of the soul.G. B. Kerferd - 1971 - Phronesis 16 (1):80-96.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • An Epicurean Interpretation of Dreams.Diskin Clay - 1980 - American Journal of Philology 101 (3):342.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Alexander of Aphrodisias on Vision in the Atomists.Ivars Avotins - 1980 - Classical Quarterly 30 (02):429-.
    In discussing the atomists' theory of vision modern accounts have quite neglected to take into account two sections of Alexander of Aphrodisias on this topic. Nearly identical in length and content, they contain objections to the atomist theory of vision by means of the . In form they consist of a series of questions purporting to contain atomist doctrine. Each question is followed by objections to its subject-matter. Most of the questions contain doctrine known to us already from other sources.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • Alexander of Aphrodisias on Vision in the Atomists.Ivars Avotins - 1980 - Classical Quarterly 30 (2):429-454.
    In discussing the atomists' theory of vision modern accounts have quite neglected to take into account two sections of Alexander of Aphrodisias on this topic. Nearly identical in length and content, they contain objections to the atomist theory of vision by means of the(henceforth ‘idols’). In form they consist of a series of questions purporting to contain atomist doctrine. Each question is followed by objections to its subject-matter. Most of the questions contain doctrine known to us already from other sources.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Lucretius' Explanation of Moving Dream Figures at 4.768-76.Elizabeth Asmis - 1981 - American Journal of Philology 102 (2):138.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation