Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Just Health Care.Norman Daniels - 1985 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
    How should medical services be distributed within society? Who should pay for them? Is it right that large amounts should be spent on sophisticated technology and expensive operations, or would the resources be better employed in, for instance, less costly preventive measures? These and others are the questions addreses in this book. Norman Daniels examines some of the dilemmas thrown up by conflicting demands for medical attention, and goes on to advance a theory of justice in the distribution of health (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   263 citations  
  • (1 other version)The concept of equal opportunity.Peter Westen - 1985 - Ethics 95 (4):837-850.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   21 citations  
  • QALYfying the value of life.J. Harris - 1987 - Journal of Medical Ethics 13 (3):117-123.
    This paper argues that the Quality Adjusted Life Year or QALY is fatally flawed as a way of priority setting in health care and of dealing with the problem of scarce resources. In addition to showing why this is so the paper sets out a view of the moral constraints that govern the allocation of health resources and suggests reasons for a new attitude to the health budget.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   98 citations  
  • Just Health Care.Cheyney Ryan - 1990 - Philosophical Review 99 (2):287.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   164 citations  
  • Setting Health Care Priorities: Oregon's Next Steps.Charles J. Dougherty - 1991 - Hastings Center Report 21 (3):1-10.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • DRGs and the Ethical Reallocation of Resources.Robert M. Veatch - 1986 - Hastings Center Report 16 (3):32-40.
    To allocate resources ethically under DRGs, we need an expanded medical ethics. Appealing to traditional patient-centred principles such as beneficence and autonomy will not be sufficient. We also need to take into account the social principles of full beneficence and justice. If marginal benefits must be eliminated, clinicians should not participate in deciding who should get less care but should remain committed to their patients' interests.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations