Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Persons and Punishment.Herbert Morris - 1968 - The Monist 52 (4):475-501.
    Alfredo Traps in Durrenmatt’s tale discovers that he has brought off, all by himself, a murder involving considerable ingenuity. The mock prosecutor in the tale demands the death penalty “as reward for a crime that merits admiration, astonishment, and respect.” Traps is deeply moved; indeed, he is exhilarated, and the whole of his life becomes more heroic, and, ironically, more precious. His defense attorney proceeds to argue that Traps was not only innocent but incapable of guilt, “a victim of the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   144 citations  
  • Guilty But Insane?Michael Davis - 1984 - Social Theory and Practice 10 (1):1-23.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • The recidivist premium.George P. Fletcher - 1982 - Criminal Justice Ethics 1 (2):54-59.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • (1 other version)Two concepts of rules.John Rawls - 1955 - Philosophical Review 64 (1):3-32.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   580 citations  
  • How to make the punishment fit the crime.Michael Davis - 1982 - Ethics 93 (4):726-752.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   19 citations  
  • Death, Deterrence, and the Method of Common Sense.Michael Davis - 1981 - Social Theory and Practice 7 (2):145-177.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Sentencing: Must justice be even-handed? [REVIEW]Michael Davis - 1982 - Law and Philosophy 1 (1):77 - 117.
    The question considered is whether a convicted criminal has been treated unjustly if the only reason he receives a much heavier sentence than another criminal convicted of the same crime is that he came before a different judge. The answer offered is that such a criminal would not be treated unjustly. The principle of equality in punishment, properly understood, does not forbid even such gross disparities in sentence (though it also does not require them). The paper discusses the 1978 Model (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation