Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. MISSing the World. Models as Isolations and Credible Surrogate Systems.Uskali Mäki - 2009 - Erkenntnis 70 (1):29-43.
    This article shows how the MISS account of models—as isolations and surrogate systems—accommodates and elaborates Sugden’s account of models as credible worlds and Hausman’s account of models as explorations. Theoretical models typically isolate by means of idealization, and they are representatives of some target system, which prompts issues of resemblance between the two to arise. Models as representations are constrained both ontologically (by their targets) and pragmatically (by the purposes and audiences of the modeller), and these relations are coordinated by (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   146 citations  
  • How economists got it wrong: A nuanced account.David Colander - 2011 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 23 (1):1-27.
    In the wake of the financial crisis of 2008, many economists have blamed economics for having failed to warn us. Paul Krugman, for example, in a well-known New York Times Magazine article, suggests that Classical economists were blinded by the beauty of mathematics, and that Keynesian economics is the path of the future. This paper argues that the evolution of economic thinking is much more nuanced than Krugman portrays it, and that instead of embracing what has become known as Keynesian (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Contested modelling: The case of economics.Uskali Mäki - 2013 - In Ulrich Gähde, Stephan Hartmann & Jörn Henning Wolf (eds.), Models, Simulations, and the Reduction of Complexity. Boston: De Gruyter. pp. 87-106.
    Economics is a culturally and politically powerful and contested discipline, and it has been that way as long as it has existed. For some commentators, economics is the "queen of the social sciences", while others view it as a "dismal science" (and both of these epithets allow for diverse interpretations; see Mäki 2002). Economics is also a discipline that deals with a dynamically complex subject matter and has a tradition of reducing this complexity by using systematic procedures of simplification. Nowadays, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • Philosophy of Economics Rules: introduction to the symposium.N. Emrah Aydinonat - 2018 - Journal of Economic Methodology 25 (3):211-217.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Explanatory Unification: Double and Doubtful.Uskali Mäki - 2001 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 31 (4):488-506.
    Explanatory unification—the urge to “explain much by little”—serves as an ideal of theorizing not only in natural sciences but also in the social sciences, most notably in economics. The ideal is occasionally challenged by appealing to the complexity and diversity of social systems and processes in space and time. This article proposes to accommodate such doubts by making a distinction between two kinds of unification and suggesting that while such doubts may be justified in regard to mere derivational unification (which (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   55 citations  
  • Dani Rodrik's Economics rules: the rights and wrongs of the dismal science. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2015, 272 pp. [REVIEW]N. Emrah Aydinonat - 2015 - Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics 8 (2):94.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Book Review:Essays in Positive Economics. Milton Friedman. [REVIEW]Henry M. Oliver Jr - 1954 - Ethics 65 (1):71-.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   195 citations  
  • On the structure of explanatory unification: the case of geographical economics.Uskali Mäki & Caterina Marchionni - 2009 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 40 (2):185-195.
    A newly emerged field within economics, known as geographical economics claims to have provided a unified approach to the study of spatial agglomerations at different spatial scales by showing how these can be traced back to the same basic economic mechanisms. We analyze this contemporary episode of explanatory unification in relation to major philosophical accounts of unification. In particular, we examine the role of argument patterns in unifying derivations, the role of ontological convictions and mathematical structures in shaping unification, the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations