Switch to: Citations

References in:

Kant’s Deduction of the Sublime

Kantian Review 23 (3):349-372 (2018)

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Artistic Sublime Revisited: Reply to Robert Clewis.Uygar Abaci - 2010 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 68 (2):170-173.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Is a theory of the sublime possible?Jane Forsey - 2007 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 65 (4):381–389.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   17 citations  
  • Reassessing Aesthetic Appreciation of Nature in the Kantian Sublime.Emily Brady - 2012 - Journal of Aesthetic Education 46 (1):91-109.
    The sublime has been a relatively neglected topic in recent work in philosophical aesthetics, with existing discussions confined mainly to problems in Kant's theory.1 Given the revival of interest in his aesthetic theory and the influence of the Kantian sublime compared to other eighteenth-century accounts, this focus is not surprising. Kant's emphasis on nature also sets his theory apart from other eighteenth-century theories that, although making nature central, also give explicit attention to moral character and mathematical ideas and generally devote (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • How is a theory of the sublime possible?Guy Sircello - 1993 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 51 (4):541-550.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   17 citations  
  • Kant and the Claims of Taste.Eva Schaper - 1979 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 38 (2):198-200.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   46 citations  
  • A Case for Kantian Artistic Sublimity: A Response to Abaci.Robert R. Clewis - 2010 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 68 (2):167-170.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • The Kantian Sublime: From Morality to Art.Paul Crowther - 1990 - Philosophy 65 (253):380-382.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   16 citations