Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. (1 other version)Paying People to Participate in Research: Why not?Paul McNeill - 1997 - Bioethics 11 (5):390-396.
    This paper argues against paying people to participate in research. Volunteering to participate as a subject in a research program is not like taking a job. The main difference is to do with the risks inherent in research. Experimentation on human beings is, by definition, trying out something with an unknown consequence and exposes people to risks of harm which cannot be known in advance. This is the main reason for independent review by committee of research programs. It is based (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   35 citations  
  • (1 other version)'Due' and 'Undue' Inducements: On Pasing Money to Research Subjects.Ruth Macklin - 1981 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 3 (5):1.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   49 citations  
  • Money for research participation: Does it jeopardize informed consent?Christine Grady - 2001 - American Journal of Bioethics 1 (2):40 – 44.
    Some are concerned about the possibility that offering money for research participation can constitute coercion or undue influence capable of distorting the judgment of potential research subjects and compromising the voluntariness of their informed consent. The author recognizes that more often than not there are multiple influences leading to decisions, including decisions about research participation. The concept of undue influence is explored, as well as the question of whether or not there is something uniquely distorting about money as opposed to (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   59 citations