Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Frankenstein as Science Fiction and Fact.J. M. van der Laan - 2010 - Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society 30 (4):298-304.
    Often called the first of its kind, Frankenstein paved the way for science fiction writing. Its depiction of a then impossible scientific feat has in our time become possible and is essentially recognizable in what we now refer to as bioengineering, biomedicine, or biotechnology. The fiction of Frankenstein has as it were given way to scientific fact. Of more importance, however, is the challenge Mary Shelley’s novel presents to the ostensibly high-minded and well-intentioned hopes and promises of the scientist/technologist. Finally, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • The psychoanalysis of science: the role of metaphor, paraplax, lacunae, and myth.Yehoyakim Stein - 2005 - Portland, Ore.: Sussex Academic Press.
    By systematically deconstructing and analysing scientific texts for irrational unconscious motivations, new scientific associations can be produced.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Frankenstein's footsteps: science, genetics and popular culture.Jon Turney - 1998 - New Haven: Yale University Press.
    Traces the depiction of biological science in mass media and how it has shaped public perceptions.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   26 citations  
  • Replicating Our Bodies, Losing Our Selves: News Media Portrayals of Human Cloning in the Wake of Dolly.Alan Petersen - 2002 - Body and Society 8 (4):71-90.
    According to recent news reports, developments in biotechnology promise to transform our bodies and our lives. Stem cell research and cloning research are reported to offer us the prospect of being able to grow `spare' body parts and to replace diseased or damaged tissue, implying that there are no natural limits to life, and that the body-machine may be endlessly repaired, and even replicated. The birth of a cloned sheep, Dolly, announced in February 1997, is seen as a milestone development (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Playing God and the Intrinsic Value of Life: Moral Problems for Synthetic Biology?Hans-Jürgen Link - 2013 - Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (2):435-448.
    Most of the reports on synthetic biology include not only familiar topics like biosafety and biosecurity but also a chapter on ‘ethical concerns’; a variety of diffuse topics that are interrelated in some way or another. This article deals with these ‘ethical concerns’. In particular it addresses issues such as the intrinsic value of life and how to deal with ‘artificial life’, and the fear that synthetic biologists are tampering with nature or playing God. Its aim is to analyse what (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  • Speak No Evil: Scientists, Responsibility, and the Public Understanding of Science. [REVIEW]Nicholas G. Evans - 2010 - NanoEthics 4 (3):215-220.
    In this paper, I will discuss the responsibilities that scientists have for ensuring their work is interpreted correctly. I will argue that there are three good reasons for scientists to work to ensure the appropriate communication of their findings. First, I will argue that scientists have a general obligation to ensure scientific research is communicated properly based on the vulnerability of others to the misrepresentation of their work. Second, I will argue that scientists have a special obligation to do so (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Frankenstein and the Debate Over Embryo Research.Michael Mulkay - 1996 - Science, Technology and Human Values 21 (2):157-176.
    This study uses evidence from the press and from the parliamentary record to examine the extent to which, and the ways in which, people involved in the public debate over laboratory experiments on human embryos in Britain during the 1980s drew on images from science fiction. It is shown that negative images from science fiction were used in the debate, but that these images could be transformed into resources for defending, as well as attacking, this form of scientific endeavor. It (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations