Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Medieval Obligationes as Logical Games of Consistency Maintenance.C. Dutilh Novaes - 2005 - Synthese 145 (3):371-395.
    I argue that the medieval form of dialectical disputation known as obligationes can be viewed as a logical game of consistency maintenance. The game has two participants, Opponent and Respondent. Opponent puts forward a proposition P; Respondent must concede, deny or doubt, on the basis of inferential relations between P and previously accepted or denied propositions, or, in case there is none, on the basis of the common set of beliefs. Respondent loses the game if he concedes a contradictory set (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   22 citations  
  • Arguing for inconsistency: dialectical games in the academy.B. Castelnérac & M. Marion - 2009 - In Giuseppe Primiero (ed.), Acts of Knowledge: History, Philosophy and Logic. College Publications.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   21 citations  
  • Context-sensitive Argumentation: Dirty Tricks in the Sophistical Refutations and a Perceptive Medieval Interpretation of the Text.Sten Ebbesen - 2011 - Vivarium 49 (1-3):75-94.
    Aristotle in the central chapters of his Sophistical Refutations gives advice on how to counter unfair argumentation by similar means, all the while taking account not only of the adversary's arguments in themselves, but also of his philosophical commitments and state of mind, as well as the impression produced on the audience. This has offended commentators, and made most of them, medieval and modern alike, pass lightly over the relevant passages. A commentary that received the last touch in the very (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations