- Why did Einstein's programme supersede lorentz's? (I).Elie Zahar - 1973 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 24 (2):95-123.details
|
|
|
Einstein Versus Lorentz: Research Programmes and the Logic of Comparative Theory Evaluation.Kenneth F. Schaffner - 1974 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 25 (1):45-78.details
|
|
|
On lorentz's methodology.Arthur I. Miller - 1974 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 25 (1):29-45.details
|
|
|
The nature of entailment.Norman Malcolm - 1940 - Mind 49 (195):333-347.details
|
|
|
The halt and the blind: Philosophy and history of science. [REVIEW]Thomas S. Kuhn - 1980 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 31 (2):181-192.details
|
|
|
The halt and the blind: Philosophy and history of science: "Method and appraisal in the physical sciences". [REVIEW]Thomas S. Kuhn - 1980 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 31 (2):181-192.details
|
|
|
Philosophical Studies.E. Jordan & G. E. Moore - 1924 - Philosophical Review 33 (1):88.details
|
|
|
Einstein, Michelson, and the "Crucial" Experiment.Gerald Holton - 1969 - Isis 60:132-197.details
|
|
|
Einstein, Michelson, and the "Crucial" Experiment.Gerald Holton - 1969 - Isis 60 (2):133-197.details
|
|
|
Mr. Pap on synonymity.Norwood R. Hanson - 1951 - Mind 60 (240):548-549.details
|
|
|
Contra-Equivalence a Defense of the Originality of Copernicus.Norwood Hanson - 1964 - Isis 55:308-325.details
|
|
|
Zahar on Einstein.Paul K. Feyerabend - 1974 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 25 (1):25-28.details
|
|
|
Sources for the History of Quantum Physics: An Inventory and Report.Thomas S. Kuhn, John L. Heilbron, Paul Forman, Lini Allen & Max Jammer - 1968 - Synthese 18 (1):118-120.details
|
|
|
The genesis of the special theory of relativity.Adolf Grünbaum - 1961 - In H. Feigl & G. Maxwell (eds.), Current Issues in the Philosophy of Science. New York. pp. 43--53.details
|
|
|
University of california, Berkeley.Paul Feyerabend - 1976 - In Colin Howson (ed.), Method and Appraisal in the Physical Sciences: The Critical Background to Modern Science, 1800-1905. Cambridge University Press. pp. 309.details
|
|
