Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. A probabilistic temporal epistemic logic: Strong completeness.Zoran Ognjanović, Angelina Ilić Stepić & Aleksandar Perović - 2024 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 32 (1):94-138.
    The paper offers a formalization of reasoning about distributed multi-agent systems. The presented propositional probabilistic temporal epistemic logic $\textbf {PTEL}$ is developed in full detail: syntax, semantics, soundness and strong completeness theorems. As an example, we prove consistency of the blockchain protocol with respect to the given set of axioms expressed in the formal language of the logic. We explain how to extend $\textbf {PTEL}$ to axiomatize the corresponding first-order logic.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Propositional temporal logics: decidability and completeness.O. Lichtenstein & A. Pneuli - 2000 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 8 (1):55-85.
    A sound and complete axiomatic system and a tableau-based decision procedure are presented for propositional temporal logic over linear and discrete time models. The axiomatic system and decision procedure are presented for the full logic, including the past operators, but contain a clear identification of the parts whose omission yields axiomatization and a decision procedure for the future fragment. The paper summarizes work of over 20 years and is intended to provide a definitive reference to the version of propositional temporal (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   16 citations  
  • Syntactic cut-elimination for common knowledge.Kai Brünnler & Thomas Studer - 2009 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 160 (1):82-95.
    We first look at an existing infinitary sequent system for common knowledge for which there is no known syntactic cut-elimination procedure and also no known non-trivial bound on the proof-depth. We then present another infinitary sequent system based on nested sequents that are essentially trees and with inference rules that apply deeply inside these trees. Thus we call this system “deep” while we call the former system “shallow”. In contrast to the shallow system, the deep system allows one to give (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations