Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Principles of Biomedical Ethics.Ezekiel J. Emanuel, Tom L. Beauchamp & James F. Childress - 1995 - Hastings Center Report 25 (4):37.
    Book reviewed in this article: Principles of Biomedical Ethics. By Tom L. Beauchamp and James F. Childress.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2238 citations  
  • (1 other version)The Imperative of Responsibility: In Search of an Ethics for the Technological Age.Hans Jonas - 1984 - Human Studies 11 (4):419-429.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   333 citations  
  • The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.David Bohm - 1964 - Philosophical Quarterly 14 (57):377-379.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1157 citations  
  • Consciousness Explained.William G. Lycan - 1993 - Philosophical Review 102 (3):424.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1124 citations  
  • Listening to Prozac.Peter D. Kramer - 1994 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 37 (3):460.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   113 citations  
  • Determining “Medical Necessity” in Mental Health Practice.James E. Sabin & Norman Daniels - 1994 - Hastings Center Report 24 (6):5-13.
    Should mental health insurance cover only disorders found in DSM‐IV, or should it be extended to treatment for ordinary shyness, unhappiness, and other responses to life's hard knocks?
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   30 citations  
  • DSM-IV Meets Philosophy.A. Frances, A. H. Mack, M. B. First, T. A. Widiger, R. Ross, L. Forman & W. W. Davis - 1994 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 19 (3):207-218.
    The authors discuss some of the conceptual issues that must be considered in using and understanding psychiatric classification. DSM-IV is a practical and common sense nosology of psychiatric disorders that is intended to improve communication in clinical practice and in research studies. DSM-IV has no philosophic pretensions but does raise many philosphical questions. This paper describes the development of DSM-IV and the way in which it addresses a number of philosophic issues: nominalism vs. realism, epistemology in science, the mind/body dichotomy, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations