Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Beyond writing: The development of literacy in the Ancient Near East.Karenleigh Overmann - 2016 - Cambridge Archaeological Journal 2 (26):285–303.
    Previous discussions of the origins of writing in the Ancient Near East have not incorporated the neuroscience of literacy, which suggests that when southern Mesopotamians wrote marks on clay in the late-fourth millennium, they inadvertently reorganized their neural activity, a factor in manipulating the writing system to reflect language, yielding literacy through a combination of neurofunctional change and increased script fidelity to language. Such a development appears to take place only with a sufficient demand for writing and reading, such as (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   20 citations  
  • Abstract.[author unknown] - 2004 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 34 (4):447-449.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   127 citations  
  • Number as a Second-Order Concept.Peter Damerow - 1996 - Science in Context 9 (2):139-149.
    My contribution will focus on a central issue of Yehuda Elkana's anthropology of knowledge — namely, the role of reflectivity in the development of knowledge. Let me therefore start with a quotation from Yehuda's paper “Experiment as a Second-Order Concept.”.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • The Neuronal Recycling Hypothesis for Reading and the Question of Reading Universals.Max Coltheart - 2014 - Mind and Language 29 (3):255-269.
    Are there universals of reading? There are three ways of construing this question. Is the region of the brain where reading is implemented identical regardless of what writing system the reader uses? Is the mental information-processing system used for reading the same regardless of what writing system the reader uses. Do the word's writing systems share certain universal features? Dehaene offers affirmative answers to all three questions in his book. Here I suggest instead that the answers should be negative. And (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • Counting in Tongan: The Traditional Number Systems and Their Cognitive Implications.Andrea Bender & Sieghard Beller - 2007 - Journal of Cognition and Culture 7 (3-4):213-239.
    Is the application of more than one number system in a particular culture necessarily an indication of not having abstracted a general concept of number? Does this mean that specific number systems for certain objects are cognitively deficient? The opposite is the case with the traditional number systems in Tongan, where a consistent decimal system is supplemented by diverging systems for certain objects, in which 20 seems to play a special role. Based on an analysis of their linguistic, historical and (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • Abstract.[author unknown] - 2011 - Dialogue and Universalism 21 (4):447-449.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   222 citations  
  • Numbers through numerals. The constitutive role of external representations.Dirk Schlimm - 2018 - In Sorin Bangu (ed.), Naturalizing Logico-Mathematical Knowledge: Approaches From Psychology and Cognitive Science. New York: Routledge. pp. 195–217.
    Our epistemic access to mathematical objects, like numbers, is mediated through our external representations of them, like numerals. Nevertheless, the role of formal notations and, in particular, of the internal structure of these notations has not received much attention in philosophy of mathematics and cognitive science. While systems of number words and of numerals are often treated alike, I argue that they have crucial structural differences, and that one has to understand how the external representation works in order to form (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  • Mathematics in the Pacific Basin.Garry J. Tee - 1988 - British Journal for the History of Science 21 (4):401-417.
    The development of systematic mathematics requires writing, and hence a non-literate culture cannot be expected to advance mathematics beyond the stage of numeral words and counting. The hundreds of languages of the Australian aborigines do not seem to have included any extensive numeral systems. However, the common assertions to the effect that ‘Aborigines have only one, two, many’ derive mostly from reports by nineteenth century Christian missionaries, who commonly understood less mathematics than did the people on whom they were reporting. (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation