Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. (1 other version)The Topography of Divine Love.Jeff Jordan - 2012 - Faith and Philosophy 29 (1):53-69.
    It is widely thought that God must love each and every human to the same depth and degree. This proposition plays a prominent role in influential versionsof the problem of evil, and in theistic attempts to answer the problem of evil. A common reason cited in support of the idea of God’s loving equally every human is that a perfect being would possess every great-making property and loving equally every human would be a great-making property. It is the argument of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • (1 other version)The Topography of Divine Love.Jeff Jordan - 2015 - Faith and Philosophy 32 (2):182-187.
    Does God love every human equally and to the deepest degree possible? In an earlier article I argued that no one could, in principle, love every human equally and to the deepest degree possible. Thomas Talbott has objected and argues that a model of the divine love extended equally to all best captures the idea of God as loving parent. I contend that Talbott’s argument fails, in part, as it implies that the divine love treats the interests of humans as (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • The Topography of Divine Love.Thomas Talbott - 2013 - Faith and Philosophy 30 (3):302-316.
    Jeff Jordan has recently challenged the idea, widely accepted among theistic philosophers, that “God’s love must be maximally extended and equally intense.” By way of a response, I suggest a way to sidestep Jordan’s argument entirely and then try to show that his own argument is multiply flawed. I thus conclude that his challenge is unsuccessful.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations