Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. In defense of the somatic mutation theory of cancer.David L. Vaux - 2011 - Bioessays 33 (5):341-343.
    According to the somatic mutation theory (SMT), cancer begins with a genetic change in a single cell that passes it on to its progeny, thereby generating a clone of malignant cells. It is strongly supported by observations of leukemias that bear specific chromosome translocations, such as Burkitt's lymphoma, in which a translocation activates the c‐myc gene, and chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), in which the Philadelphia chromosome causes production of the BCR‐ABL oncoprotein. Although the SMT has been modified and extended to (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  • Counterpoints in cancer: The somatic mutation theory under attack.David Thomas & Andrew Moore - 2011 - Bioessays 33 (5):313-314.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • The tissue organization field theory of cancer: A testable replacement for the somatic mutation theory.Ana M. Soto & Carlos Sonnenschein - 2011 - Bioessays 33 (5):332-340.
    The somatic mutation theory (SMT) of cancer has been and remains the prevalent theory attempting to explain how neoplasms arise and progress. This theory proposes that cancer is a clonal, cell‐based disease, and implicitly assumes that quiescence is the default state of cells in multicellular organisms. The SMT has not been rigorously tested, and several lines of evidence raise questions that are not addressed by this theory. Herein, we propose experimental strategies that may validate the SMT. We also call attention (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   40 citations