Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Early Mendelism and the subversion of taxonomy: epistemological obstacles as institutions.Staffan Müller-Wille - 2005 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 36 (3):465-487.
    This paper presents and discusses a series of hybridization experiments carried out by Nils Herman Nilsson-Ehle between 1900 and 1907 at a plant breeding station in Svalöf, Sweden. Since the late 1880s, the Svalöf station had been renowned for its ‘scientific’ breeding methods, which basically consisted of an elaborate system of record-keeping through which the offspring of individual plants were traced over generations while being meticulously described. This record system corresponded to a certain breeding technique and certain theoretical convictions . (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   19 citations  
  • The Rise of Statistical Thinking, 1820-1900.Theodore M. Porter - 1986 - Princeton University Press: Princeton.
    Emphasizing the debt of science to nonspecialist intellectuals, Theodore Porter describes in detail the nineteenth-century background that produced the burst of modern statistical innovation of the early 1900s. Statistics arose as a study of society--the science of the statist--and the pioneering statistical physicists and biologists, Maxwell, Boltzmann, and Galton, each introduced statistical models by pointing to analogies between his discipline and social science.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   68 citations  
  • R. A. Fisher and his advocacy of randomization.Nancy S. Hall - 2007 - Journal of the History of Biology 40 (2):295-325.
    The requirement of randomization in experimental design was first stated by R. A. Fisher, statistician and geneticist, in 1925 in his book Statistical Methods for Research Workers. Earlier designs were systematic and involved the judgment of the experimenter; this led to possible bias and inaccurate interpretation of the data. Fisher's dictum was that randomization eliminates bias and permits a valid test of significance. Randomization in experimenting had been used by Charles Sanders Peirce in 1885 but the practice was not continued. (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  • The Empire of Chance: How Probability Changed Science and Everyday Life.Gerd Gigerenzer, Zeno Swijtink, Theodore Porter, Lorraine Daston, John Beatty & Lorenz Kruger - 1990 - Cambridge University Press.
    The Empire of Chance tells how quantitative ideas of chance transformed the natural and social sciences, as well as daily life over the last three centuries. A continuous narrative connects the earliest application of probability and statistics in gambling and insurance to the most recent forays into law, medicine, polling and baseball. Separate chapters explore the theoretical and methodological impact in biology, physics and psychology. Themes recur - determinism, inference, causality, free will, evidence, the shifting meaning of probability - but (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   110 citations  
  • The History of Statistics: The Measurement of Uncertainty Before 1900.Stephen M. Stigler - 1986 - Harvard University Press: Cambridge.
    Stigler shows how statistics arose from the interplay of mathematical concepts and the needs of several applied sciences. His emphasis is upon how methods of probability theory were developed for measuring uncertainty, for reducing uncertainty, and as a conceptual framework for quantitative studies in the social sciences.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   29 citations  
  • Early Mendelism and the subversion of taxonomy: epistemological obstacles as institutions.Staffan Müller-Wille - 2005 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 36 (3):465-487.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  • Agricultural research in Britain, 1850–1914: Failure, success and development.Paul Brassley - 1995 - Annals of Science 52 (5):465-480.
    The development of agricultural science in the period 1850–1914 is described in the context of various methods of deciding whether or not it was successful. It is concluded that it was more successful after 1890 than before, and an explanation of this is offered, using a model first applied to agricultural research in Germany. In the light of these conclusions there are also comments on the role of the Development Commission in promoting agricultural research.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • The Statistical Frame of Mind in Systematic Biology from Quantitative Zoology to Biometry.Joel Hagen - 2003 - Journal of the History of Biology 36 (2):353-384.
    The twentieth century witnessed a dramatic increase in the use of statistics by biologists, including systematists. The modern synthesis and new systematics stimulated this development, particularly after World War II. The rise of "the statistical frame of mind " resulted in a rethinking of the relationship between biological and mathematical points of view, the roles of objectivity and subjectivity in systematic research, the implications of new computing technologies, and the place of systematics among the biological disciplines.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   18 citations  
  • Karl Pearson: The Scientific Life in a Statistical Age.Theodore M. Porter - 2005 - Journal of the History of Biology 38 (1):157-159.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   39 citations