Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. The burdens-benefits ratio consideration for medical administration of nutrition and hydration to persons in the persistent vegetative state.John C. Harvey - 2006 - Christian Bioethics 12 (1):99-106.
    In this article, Harvey notes the initial confusion about the statement made by the pope concerning artificial nutrition and hydration on patients suffering persistent vegetative states (PVS) due to misunderstanding through the translation of the pope's words. He clarifies and assesses what was meant by the statement. He also discusses the problems of terminology concerned with the subject of PVS. Harvey concludes that the papal allocution was in line with traditional Catholic bioethics, and that while maintaining the life of a (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Acts and omissions.C. Honey - 1979 - Journal of Medical Ethics 5 (3):143-144.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • On acts, omissions and responsibility.J. Coggon - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (8):576-579.
    This paper questions the relevance of distinguishing acts and omissions in moral argument. It responds to an article by McLachlan, published in this issue of the Journal of Medical Ethics .1 I argue that McLachlan fails to establish that there is a moral difference between active and passive euthanasia and that he instead merely asserts that the difference exists. I suggest that McLachlan’s paper relies on a false commitment to general rules that do not apply in every case. Furthermore, I (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  • Making Christian Life and Death Decisions.Kevin L. Flannery - 2011 - Christian Bioethics 17 (2):140-152.
    Decisions about withdrawing or continuing life-sustaining treatments are often not made in a reasoned manner: those who must make the decisions are often not sure what would constitute an upright decision and, therefore, doubt the correctness of the decisions they have made or are about to make. Making use especially of what Thomas Aquinas says about omissions , this article attempts to establish some principles regarding when and why one might morally withdraw life-sustaining treatments, regarding the grounds on which a (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Commentary.G. E. M. Anscombe - 1981 - Journal of Medical Ethics 7 (3):122-123.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Making Christian Life and Death Decisions.S. J. Flannery - 2011 - Christian Bioethics 17 (2):140-152.
    Decisions about withdrawing or continuing life-sustaining treatments are often not made in a reasoned manner: those who must make the decisions are often not sure what would constitute an upright decision and, therefore, doubt the correctness of the decisions they have made or are about to make. Making use especially of what Thomas Aquinas says about omissions (i.e., omitting to do something), this article attempts to establish some principles regarding when and why one might (and might not) morally withdraw life-sustaining (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations