Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. The Einstein-podolsky-Rosen paradox re-examined.David H. Sharp - 1961 - Philosophy of Science 28 (3):225-233.
    This paper discusses the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox from a new point of view. In section II, the arguments by which Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen reach their paradoxical conclusions are presented. They are found to rest on two critical assumptions: (a) that before a measurement is made on a system consisting of two non-interacting but correlated sub-systems, the state of the entire system is exactly represented by: ψ a (r̄ 1 ,r̄ 2 )=∑ η a η τ η (r̄ 1 ,r̄ 2 (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • Comments on the paper of David sharp.Hilary Putnam - 1961 - Philosophy of Science 28 (3):234-237.
    Mr. Sharp's resolution of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox is, in my opinion, the right one. However, the resolution does not in my opinion show that “God's in his heaven; all's right with the world.” This is in no way a criticism of Sharp; rather, it is inevitable that any resolution of this paradox, dealing as it does with the quantum mechanical concept of “measurement”, must tangle with some of the real difficulties which are lurking in the notion. The purpose of these (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • Comments on professor Putnam's comments.H. Margenau & E. P. Wigner - 1962 - Philosophy of Science 29 (3):292-293.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations