Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. On model-theoretic tree properties.Artem Chernikov & Nicholas Ramsey - 2016 - Journal of Mathematical Logic 16 (2):1650009.
    We study model theoretic tree properties and their associated cardinal invariants. In particular, we obtain a quantitative refinement of Shelah’s theorem for countable theories, show that [Formula: see text] is always witnessed by a formula in a single variable and that weak [Formula: see text] is equivalent to [Formula: see text]. Besides, we give a characterization of [Formula: see text] via a version of independent amalgamation of types and apply this criterion to verify that some examples in the literature are (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   25 citations  
  • Theories without the tree property of the second kind.Artem Chernikov - 2014 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 165 (2):695-723.
    We initiate a systematic study of the class of theories without the tree property of the second kind — NTP2. Most importantly, we show: the burden is “sub-multiplicative” in arbitrary theories ; NTP2 is equivalent to the generalized Kimʼs lemma and to the boundedness of ist-weight; the dp-rank of a type in an arbitrary theory is witnessed by mutually indiscernible sequences of realizations of the type, after adding some parameters — so the dp-rank of a 1-type in any theory is (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   37 citations  
  • A remark on the strict order property.A. H. Lachlan - 1975 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 21 (1):69-70.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • On ◁∗-maximality.Mirna Džamonja & Saharon Shelah - 2004 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 125 (1-3):119-158.
    This paper investigates a connection between the semantic notion provided by the ordering * among theories in model theory and the syntactic SOPn hierarchy of Shelah. It introduces two properties which are natural extensions of this hierarchy, called SOP2 and SOP1. It is shown here that SOP3 implies SOP2 implies SOP1. In Shelah's article 229) it was shown that SOP3 implies *-maximality and we prove here that *-maximality in a model of GCH implies a property called SOP2″. It has been (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   31 citations