Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. A full-pull program for the provision of pharmaceuticals: Practical issues.Michael J. Selgelid - 2008 - Public Health Ethics 1 (2):134-145.
    Centre for Applied Philosophy and Public Ethics (CAPPE), Menzies Centre for Health Policy, The Australian National University, LPO Box 8260, ANU Canberra ACT 2601, Australia. Tel.: +61 (0)2 6125 4355; Mobile: +61 (0)431 124 286; Fax: +61 (0)2 6125 6579; Email: michael.selgelid{at}anu.edu.au ' + u + '@' + d + ' '//--> Abstract Thomas Pogge has proposed a supplement to the standard patent regime whereby innovating companies would be rewarded in proportion to the extent to which their innovations lead to (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • Strong Medicine: Creating Incentives for Pharmaceutical Research on Neglected Diseases.Michael Kremer & Rachel Glennerster - 2005 - Ethics and International Affairs 19 (3).
    The authors suggest creating a scheme that offers new incentives for research on diseases disproportionately affecting the poor, with the goal of making development of neglected disease vaccines a lucrative endeavor for pharmaceutical companies.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  • Three proposals for rewarding novel health technologies benefiting people living in poverty. A comparative analysis of prize funds, health impact funds and a cost-effectiveness/competitive tender treaty.Thomas Alured Faunce & Hitoshi Nasu - 2008 - Public Health Ethics 1 (2):146-153.
    Thomas Alured Faunce, College of Law, Fellows Road, Acton, Canberra ACT 0200, Australian National University, Fax: 61 2 61253971, Email: Thomas.Faunce{at}anu.edu.au ' + u + '@' + d + ' '//-->This paper sets out to analyse three different academic proposals for addressing the needs of the poor in relation to new, rather than ‘essential’ medicines. It focuses particularly on research and development prize funds, a health impact fund system and a multilateral treaty on health technology cost-effectiveness evaluation and competitive tender. (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Patents, biomedical research, and treatments: Examining concerns, canvassing solutions.Josephine Johnston & Angela A. Wasunna - 2007 - Hastings Center Report 37 (1):1-36.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • Race against time: The export of essential medicines to rwanda.Matthew Rimmer - 2008 - Public Health Ethics 1 (2):89-103.
    Matthew Rimmer, ACIPA, The Australian National University, College of Law, Canberra, ACT, 0200, Australia. Tel.: (02) 61254164; Email: matthew.rimmer{at}anu.edu.au ' + u + '@' + d + ' '//--> Abstract This article considers the significance of the first export of essential medicines under the WTO General Council Decision 2003. In July 2007, Rwanda became the first country to provide a notification under the WTO General Council Decision 2003 of its intent to import a fixed-dose, triple combination HIV/AIDS drug manufactured by (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • The health impact fund: A useful supplement to the patent system?Aidan Hollis - 2008 - Public Health Ethics 1 (2):124-133.
    Department of Economics, University of Calgary, 2500 University Dr NW, Calgary AB, T2N 1N4, Canada. Tel.: +1403220 5861; Fax: +1403220 5861; Email: ahollis{at}ucalgary.ca ' + u + '@' + d + ' '//--> . Abstract The Health Impact Fund has been proposed as an optional, comprehensive advance market commitment system offering financial payments or ‘prizes’ to patentees of new drugs, which are sold globally at an administered low price. The Fund is designed to offer payments based on the therapeutic impact (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   18 citations