Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Disability, gene therapy and eugenics - a challenge to John Harris.S. M. Reindal - 2000 - Journal of Medical Ethics 26 (2):89 - 94.
    This article challenges the view of disability presented by Harris in his article, “Is gene therapy a form of eugenics?”1 It is argued that his definition of disability rests on an individual model of disability, where disability is regarded as a product of biological determinism or “personal tragedy” in the individual. Within disability theory this view is often called “the medical model” and it has been criticised for not being able to deal with the term “disability”, but only with impairment. (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  • Parental consent to cosmetic facial surgery in Down's syndrome.R. B. Jones - 2000 - Journal of Medical Ethics 26 (2):101-102.
    It is suggested that the practice of attempting to normalise children with Down 's syndrome by subjecting them to major facial plastic surgery has no therapeutic benefit, and should be seen as mutilating surgery comparable to female circumcision.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Is there a coherent social conception of disability?J. Harris - 2000 - Journal of Medical Ethics 26 (2):95-100.
    Is there such a thing as a social conception of disability? Recently two writers in this journal have suggested not only that there is a coherent social conception of disability but that all non-social conceptions, or “medical models” of disability are fatally flawed. One serious and worrying dimension of their claims is that once the social dimensions of disability have been resolved no seriously “disabling” features remain. This paper examines and rejects conceptions of disability based on social factors but notes (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   43 citations  
  • Health.R. M. Hare - 1986 - Journal of Medical Ethics 12 (4):174-181.
    Many practical issues in medical ethics depend on an understanding of the concept of health. The main question is whether it is a purely descriptive or a partly evaluative or normative concept. After posing some puzzles about the concept, the views of C Boorse, who thinks it is descriptive, are discussed and difficulties are found for them. An evaluative treatment is then suggested, and used to shed light on some problems about mental illness and to compare and contrast it with (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   17 citations