Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. What can Milgram and Zimbardo teach ethics committees and qualitative researchers about minimizing harm?Martin Tolich - 2014 - Research Ethics 10 (2):86-96.
    The first objective of this article is to demonstrate that ethics committee members can learn a great deal from a forensic analysis of two classic psychology studies: Zimbardo’s Stanford Prison Study and Milgram’s Obedience Study. Rather than using hindsight to retrospectively eradicate the harm in these studies, the article uses a prospective minimization of harm technique. Milgram attempted to be ethical by trying to protect his subjects through debriefing and a follow-up survey. He could have done more, however, by carrying (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Virality: Contagion Theory in the Age of Networks.Tony D. Sampson - 2012 - Univ of Minnesota Press.
    In this thought-provoking work, Tony D. Sampson presents a contagion theory fit for the age of networks. Unlike memes and microbial contagions, _Virality_ does not restrict itself to biological analogies and medical metaphors. It instead points toward a theory of contagious assemblages, events, and affects. For Sampson, contagion is not necessarily a positive or negative force of encounter; it is how society comes together and relates. Sampson argues that a biological knowledge of contagion has been universally distributed by way of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  • Virality: Contagion Theory in the Age of Networks by Tony D. Sampson.Jussi Parikka - 2013 - Theory, Culture and Society 30 (3):131-136.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation