Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. (1 other version)Scoring Rules, Condorcet Efficiency and Social Homogeneity.Dominique Lepelley, Patrick Pierron & Fabrice Valognes - 2000 - Theory and Decision 49 (2):175-196.
    In a three-candidate election, a scoring rule s (s in [0,1]) assigns 1, s, and 0 points (respectively) to each first, second and third place in the individual preference rankings. The Condorcet efficiency of a scoring rule is defined as the conditional probability that this rule selects the winner in accordance with Condorcet criteria (three Condorcet criteria are considered in the paper). We are interested in the following question: What rule s has the greatest Condorcet efficiency? After recalling the known (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • The Theory of Committees and Elections.Duncan Black - 1961 - Philosophy 36 (137):248-249.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   73 citations  
  • Metapreferences and the reasons for stability in social choice: Thoughts on broadening and clarifying the debate.Bernard Grofman & Carole Uhlaner - 1985 - Theory and Decision 19 (1):31-50.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations