Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Is there a coherent social conception of disability?J. Harris - 2000 - Journal of Medical Ethics 26 (2):95-100.
    Is there such a thing as a social conception of disability? Recently two writers in this journal have suggested not only that there is a coherent social conception of disability but that all non-social conceptions, or “medical models” of disability are fatally flawed. One serious and worrying dimension of their claims is that once the social dimensions of disability have been resolved no seriously “disabling” features remain. This paper examines and rejects conceptions of disability based on social factors but notes (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   44 citations  
  • Beyond the dilemma of difference: The capability approach to disability and special educational needs.Lorella Terzi - 2005 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 39 (3):443–459.
    In her recent pamphlet Special Educational Needs: a new look (2005) Mary Warnock has called for a radical review of special needs education and a substantial reconsideration of the assumptions upon which the current educational framework is based. The latter, she maintains, is hindered by a contradiction between the intention to treat all learners as the same and that of responding adequately to the needs arising from their individual differences. The tension highlighted by Warnock, which is central to the debate (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   23 citations  
  • Redefining Disability: Maleficent, Unjust and Inconsistent.Becky Cox-White & Susanna Flavia Boxall - 2008 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 33 (6):558-576.
    Disability activists' redefinition of “disability” as a social, rather than a medical, problem attempts to reassign causality. We explicate the untenable implications of this approach and argue this definition is maleficent, unjust, and inconsistent. Thus, redefining disability as a socially caused phenomenon is, from a moral point of view, ill-advised.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Disability, gene therapy and eugenics - a challenge to John Harris.S. M. Reindal - 2000 - Journal of Medical Ethics 26 (2):89 - 94.
    This article challenges the view of disability presented by Harris in his article, “Is gene therapy a form of eugenics?”1 It is argued that his definition of disability rests on an individual model of disability, where disability is regarded as a product of biological determinism or “personal tragedy” in the individual. Within disability theory this view is often called “the medical model” and it has been criticised for not being able to deal with the term “disability”, but only with impairment. (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  • Social Reality.Finn Collin - 1997 - Philosophy 73 (286):643-647.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   16 citations