Switch to: Citations

References in:

Introduction

Argumentation 27 (1):1-6 (2013)

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. The Uses of Argument.Stephen Toulmin - 1958 - Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
    A central theme throughout the impressive series of philosophical books and articles Stephen Toulmin has published since 1948 is the way in which assertions and opinions concerning all sorts of topics, brought up in everyday life or in academic research, can be rationally justified. Is there one universal system of norms, by which all sorts of arguments in all sorts of fields must be judged, or must each sort of argument be judged according to its own norms? In The Uses (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   261 citations  
  • The Historiography of Philosophy: Four Genres.Richard Rorty - 1984 - In . Cambridge University Press.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   73 citations  
  • (1 other version)The Uses of Argument.Stephen E. Toulmin - 1958 - Philosophy 34 (130):244-245.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   708 citations  
  • Rhetoric and Dialectic: Some Historical and Legal Perspectives. [REVIEW]Hanns Hohmann - 2000 - Argumentation 14 (3):223-234.
    The thesis is defended that rhetoric is not, as is often said, a discipline which is hierarchically subordinate to dialectic. It is argued that the modalities of the links between rhetoric and dialectic must be seen in a somewhat different light: rhetoric and dialectic should be viewed as two complementary disciplines. On the basis of a historical survey of the views of various authors on the links between rhetoric and dialectic, it is concluded that efforts to establish clear boundaries or (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • On sophistical refutations. Aristotle - unknown
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   79 citations  
  • Philosophy in History.Terence Ball - 1986 - Philosophy 61 (237):409-414.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • In What Sense Do Modern Argumentation Theories Relate to Aristotle? The Case of Pragma-Dialectics.Frans H. van Eemeren - 2013 - Argumentation 27 (1):49-70.
    According to van Eemeren, argumentation theory is a hybrid discipline, because it requires a multidisciplinary, if not interdisciplinary approach, combining descriptive and normative insights. He points out that modern argumentation theorists give substance to the discipline by relying either on a dialectical perspective, concentrating on the reasonableness of argumentation, or on a rhetorical perspective, concentrating on its effectiveness. Both the dialectical and the rhetorical perspective are interpreted in ways related to how they were viewed by Aristotle, but in modern argumentation (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  • Topica. Aristotle - unknown
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   40 citations