Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Treatment Decision Making for Incapacitated Patients: Is Development and Use of a Patient Preference Predictor Feasible?Annette Rid & David Wendler - 2014 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 39 (2):130-152.
    It has recently been proposed to incorporate the use of a “Patient Preference Predictor” (PPP) into the process of making treatment decisions for incapacitated patients. A PPP would predict which treatment option a given incapacitated patient would most likely prefer, based on the individual’s characteristics and information on what treatment preferences are correlated with these characteristics. Including a PPP in the shared decision-making process between clinicians and surrogates has the potential to better realize important ethical goals for making treatment decisions (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   21 citations  
  • Can We Improve Treatment Decision-Making for Incapacitated Patients?Annette Rid & David Wendler - 2010 - Hastings Center Report 40 (5):36-45.
    When patients cannot make their own treatment decisions, surrogates typically step in to do it for them. Surrogate decision‐making is far from ideal, of course, as the surrogate may not know what the patient prefers or what best promotes her interests. One way to improve it would be to arm surrogates with information about what patients in similar circumstances tend to prefer, allowing them to make empirically grounded predictions about what their patient would want.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations  
  • Turning failures into successes: A methodological shortcoming in empirical research on surrogate accuracy.Mats Johansson & Linus Broström - 2008 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (1):17-26.
    Decision making for incompetent patients is a much-discussed topic in bioethics. According to one influential decision making standard, the substituted judgment standard, a surrogate decision maker ought to make the decision that the incompetent patient would have made, had he or she been competent. Empirical research has been conducted in order to find out whether surrogate decision makers are sufficiently good at doing their job, as this is defined by the substituted judgment standard. This research investigates to what extent surrogates (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Surrogates Have Not Been Shown to Make Inaccurate Substituted Judgments.Mats Johansson & Linus Broström - 2009 - Journal of Clinical Ethics 20 (3):266-273.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Enough: The Failure of the Living Will.Angela Fagerlin & Carl E. Schneider - 2004 - Hastings Center Report 34 (2):30-42.
    In pursuit of the dream that patients' exercise of autonomy could extend beyond their span of competence, living wills have passed from controversy to conventional wisdom, to widely promoted policy. But the policy has not produced results, and should be abandoned.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   72 citations  
  • Decisions at the End of Life Guided by Communities of Patients.Linda L. Emanuel & Ezekiel J. Emanuel - 1993 - Hastings Center Report 23 (5):6.
    To guide treatment decisions for incompetent patients who have no advance directives, health care institutions should look to the preferences of their own communities of patients. That is the best way to ensure that incompetent patients' wishes will be followed.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • (1 other version)Fine‐Tuning the Future.Robert Baker - 2010 - Hastings Center Report 40 (3):6-7.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Deciding for Others: The Ethics of Surrogate Decision Making.Allen E. Buchanan & Dan W. Brock - 1989 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Dan W. Brock.
    This book is the most comprehensive treatment available of one of the most urgent - and yet in some respects most neglected - problems in bioethics: decision-making for incompetents. Part I develops a general theory for making treatment and care decisions for patients who are not competent to decide for themselves. It provides an in-depth analysis of competence, articulates and defends a coherent set of principles to specify suitable surrogate decisionmakers and to guide their choices, examines the value of advance (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   259 citations