Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. A rigorous proof of determinism derived from the special theory of relativity.C. W. Rietdijk - 1966 - Philosophy of Science 33 (4):341-344.
    A proof is given that there does not exist an event, that is not already in the past for some possible distant observer at the (our) moment that the latter is "now" for us. Such event is as "legally" past for that distant observer as is the moment five minutes ago on the sun for us (irrespective of the circumstance that the light of the sun cannot reach us in a period of five minutes). Only an extreme positivism: "that which (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   91 citations  
  • Another proof that the future can influence the present.C. W. Rietdijk - 1981 - Foundations of Physics 11 (9-10):783-790.
    A modified Young double-slit experiment proposed by Wootters and Zurek is considered in which a system P of parallel plates covered with a photographic emulsion has been set up in the region where we would normally expect the central interference fringes. Because under certain conditions P makes it possible to conclude with much more than50% certainty through which of the two slits each particular photon passed, the relevant interference pattern becomes blurred. It is proved that this implies a retroactive effect (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Whiteheadian approach to quantum theory and the generalized Bell's theorem.Henry P. Stapp - 1979 - Foundations of Physics 9 (1-2):1-25.
    The model of the world proposed by Whitehead provides a natural theoretical framework in which to imbed quantum theory. This model accords with the ontological ideas of Heisenberg, and also with Einstein's view that physical theories should refer nominally to the objective physical situation, rather than our knowledge of that system. Whitehead imposed on his model the relativistic requirement that what happens in any given spacetime region be determined only by what has happened in its absolute past, i.e., in the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  • Proof of a retroactive influence.C. W. Rietdijk - 1978 - Foundations of Physics 8 (7-8):615-628.
    Quantum theory predicts that, e.g., in a Stern-Gerlach experiment with electrons the measured spin component $S_Z = \pm \frac{1}{2}$ does not come about by an adjustment at the last moment, a forced “flipping” or “tilting” of the spin (vector), which would imply z-angular momentum exchange between particle and instrument, but will afterward appear to have had the value $\frac{1}{2} or - \frac{1}{2}$ already before the measurement. Because an electron spin cannot have components $ \pm \frac{1}{2}$ in all directions at the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  • Special relativity and determinism.C. W. Rietdijk - 1976 - Philosophy of Science 43 (4):598-609.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   17 citations  
  • Locality and reality.Henry P. Stapp - 1980 - Foundations of Physics 10 (9-10):767-795.
    Einstein's principle that no signal travels faster than light suggests that observations in one spacetime region should not depend on whether or not a radioactive decay is detected in a spacelike-separated region. This locality property is incompatible with the predictions of quantum theory, and this incompatibility holds independently of the questions of realism, objective reality, and hidden variables. It holds both in the pragmatic quantum theory of Bohr and in realistic frameworks. It is shown here to hold in a completed (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations