Switch to: Citations

References in:

Kant against Hobbes in theory and practice

Journal of Moral Philosophy 4 (2):194-206 (2007)

Add references

You must login to add references.

Groundwork for the metaphysics of morals.Immanuel Kant - 1785 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by Thomas E. Hill & Arnulf Zweig.details In this classic text, Kant sets out to articulate and defend the Categorical Imperative - the fundamental principle that underlies moral reasoning - and to lay the foundation for a comprehensive account of justice and human virtues. This new edition and translation of Kant's work is designed especially for students. An extensive and comprehensive introduction explains the central concepts of Groundwork and looks at Kant's main lines of argument. Detailed notes aim to clarify Kant's thoughts and to correct some common (...) Download Export citation Bookmark 1059 citations
(1 other version)Kantian constructivism in moral theory.John Rawls - 1980 - Journal of Philosophy 77 (9):515-572.details Download Export citation Bookmark 539 citations
S.Immanuel Kant - 1969 - In Allgemeiner Kantindex Zu Kants Gesammelten Schriften. Band. 20. Abt. 3: Personenindex Zu Kants Gesammelten Schriften. De Gruyter. pp. 112-126.details Download Export citation Bookmark 517 citations
The conflict of the faculties =.Immanuel Kant - 1979 - Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press. Edited by Mary J. Gregor.details It is in the interest of the totalitarian state that subjects not think for themselves, much less confer about their thinking. Writing under the hostile watch of the Prussian censorship, Immanuel Kant dared to argue the need for open argument, in the university if nowhere else. In this heroic criticism of repression, first published in 1798, he anticipated the crises that endanger the free expression of ideas in the name of national policy. Composed of three sections written at different times, (...) Download Export citation Bookmark 63 citations
Michael Oakeshott as a critic of Hobbes's theory of the will.Patrick Riley - 2004 - Rivista di Storia Della Filosofia 1.details Michael Oakeshott as a Critic of Hobbes's Theory of the Will - ABSTRACT: Patrick Riley asks why the post-War Oakeshott stopped speaking of the incoherence of Hobbes’s philosophy of volition, as he had in his Hobbes studies before the War. One answer is that he became more and more sensitive to the necessity of counterbalancing the determinist reading of Hobbes, which tended to be dominant in the 1970s’ Hobbes studies. He cites the example of Thomas Spragens’s The Politics of Motion (...) Download Export citation Bookmark 1 citation

1