Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. The Case for Kidney Donation Before End-of-Life Care.Paul E. Morrissey - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (6):1-8.
    Donation after cardiac death (DCD) is associated with many problems, including ischemic injury, high rates of delayed allograft function, and frequent organ discard. Furthermore, many potential DCD donors fail to progress to asystole in a manner that would enable safe organ transplantation and no organs are recovered. DCD protocols are based upon the principle that the donor must be declared dead prior to organ recovery. A new protocol is proposed whereby after a donor family agrees to withdrawal of life-sustaining treatments, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   17 citations  
  • Truth or consequences: The role of philosophers in policy-making.Dan W. Brock - 1987 - Ethics 97 (4):786-791.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   42 citations  
  • Can the Brain-Dead Be Harmed or Wronged?: On the Moral Status of Brain Death and its Implications for Organ Transplantation.Michael Nair-Collins - 2017 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 27 (4):525-559.
    The dead donor rule, which requires that organ donors not be killed by the process of organ procurement, is thought to protect vulnerable patients from exploitation and from being harmed through organ procurement. In current practice, the majority of transplantable organs are retrieved from patients who are declared dead by neurological criteria, or "brain-dead." Because brain death is considered to be sufficient for death, it is thought that brain-dead donors are neither harmed nor wronged by organ removal.In this essay I (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • The dead donor rule and the concept of death: Severing the ties that bind them.Elysa R. Koppelman - 2003 - American Journal of Bioethics 3 (1):1 – 9.
    One goal of the transplant community is to seek ways to increase the number of people who are willing and able to donate organs. People in states between life and death are often medically excellent candidates for donating organs. Yet public policy surrounding organ procurement is a delicate matter. While there is the utilitarian goal of increasing organ supply, there is also the deontologic concern about respect for persons. Public policy must properly mediate between these two concerns. Currently the dead (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   27 citations  
  • The Dead Donor Rule.John A. Robertson - 1999 - Hastings Center Report 29 (6):6.
    The scarcity of vital organs has prompted several calls to either modify the dead donor rule or interpret it more broadly. Given its symbolic importance, however, the rule should be changed only cautiously.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   61 citations  
  • The Moral Insignificance of Death in Organ Donation.Walter Glannon - 2013 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 22 (2):192-202.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • Delimiting the Donor: The Dead Donor Rule.John A. Robertson - 1999 - Hastings Center Report 29 (6):6-14.
    The scarcity of vital organs has prompted several calls to either modify the dead donor rule or interpret it more broadly. Given its symbolic importance, however, the rule should be changed only cautiously.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   49 citations  
  • Political Minimalism and Social Debates: The Case of Human-Enhancement Technologies.Javier Rodríguez-Alcázar - 2017 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 14 (3):347-357.
    A faulty understanding of the relationship between morality and politics encumbers many contemporary debates on human enhancement. As a result, some ethical reflections on enhancement undervalue its social dimensions, while some social approaches to the topic lack normative import. In this essay, I use my own conception of the relationship between ethics and politics, which I call “political minimalism,” in order to support and strengthen the existing social perspectives on human-enhancement technologies.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations