Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Principles of biomedical ethics.Tom L. Beauchamp - 1979 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by James F. Childress.
    Over the course of its first seven editions, Principles of Biomedical Ethics has proved to be, globally, the most widely used, authored work in biomedical ethics. It is unique in being a book in bioethics used in numerous disciplines for purposes of instruction in bioethics. Its framework of moral principles is authoritative for many professional associations and biomedical institutions-for instruction in both clinical ethics and research ethics. It has been widely used in several disciplines for purposes of teaching in the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1942 citations  
  • (1 other version)Principles of Biomedical Ethics.Ezekiel J. Emanuel, Tom L. Beauchamp & James F. Childress - 1995 - Hastings Center Report 25 (4):37.
    Book reviewed in this article: Principles of Biomedical Ethics. By Tom L. Beauchamp and James F. Childress.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2235 citations  
  • Ethics.William Frankena - 1967 - Philosophy of Science 34 (1):74-74.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   294 citations  
  • Handbook of Qualitative Research.N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln - 1994 - British Journal of Educational Studies 42 (4):409-410.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   219 citations  
  • Doctor-patient relationships in general practice--a different model.T. Kushner - 1981 - Journal of Medical Ethics 7 (3):128-131.
    Philosophical concerns cannot be excluded from even a cursory examination of the physician-patient relationship. Two possible alternatives for determining what this relationship entails are the teleological (outcome) approach vs the deontological (process) one. Traditionally, this relationship has been structured around the 'clinical model' which views the physician-patient relationship in teleological terms. Data on the actual content of general medical practice indicate the advisability of reassessing this relationship, and suggest that the 'clinical model' may be too limiting, and that a more (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Review of Edmund D. Pellegrino: For the patient's good: the restoration of beneficence in health care[REVIEW]Donald VanDeVeer - 1990 - Ethics 100 (2):434-436.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   55 citations