Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Restitution and revenge.David B. Hershenov - 1999 - Journal of Philosophy 96 (2):79-94.
    The aim of this paper is to provide a broad sketch of the advantages of the debt/atonement approach to punishment. Such an approach is appealing for it can benefit both the victim and the remorseful victimizer. Compared to other theories, it gives a fuller and more unified account of our intuitions about paying debts, doing penance, alleviating guilt, granting forgiveness, and offsetting privileges, pleasures and burdens. The theory also allows us to avoid justifying punishment on the basis of using some (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  • (8 other versions)Utilitarianism.J. S. Mill - 1861 - Oxford University Press UK. Edited by Roger Crisp.
    Introduction to one of the most important, controversial, and suggestive works of moral philosophy ever written.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   576 citations  
  • Why is revenge wrong?Suzanne Uniacke - 2000 - Journal of Value Inquiry 34 (1):61-69.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  • Norms of revenge.Jon Elster - 1990 - Ethics 100 (4):862-885.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   33 citations  
  • Wild Justice.Gerry Wallace - 1995 - Philosophy 70 (273):363 - 375.
    Shylock's famous speech is music to the ears of modern liberals: Hath not a Jew eyes, organs, dimensions, senses, affections, passions? Fed with the same food, hurt with the same weapons, subject to the same diseases, heated by the same means, warmed and cooled by the same winter and summer, as a Christian is? If you pick us, do we not bleed? If you tickle us do we not laugh? If you poison us do we not die?
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation