Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. (1 other version)Paying People to Participate in Research: Why not?Paul McNeill - 1997 - Bioethics 11 (5):390-396.
    This paper argues against paying people to participate in research. Volunteering to participate as a subject in a research program is not like taking a job. The main difference is to do with the risks inherent in research. Experimentation on human beings is, by definition, trying out something with an unknown consequence and exposes people to risks of harm which cannot be known in advance. This is the main reason for independent review by committee of research programs. It is based (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   35 citations  
  • The research subject as wage earner.James A. Anderson & Charles Weijer - 2002 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 23 (4-5):359-376.
    The practice of paying research subjects for participating inclinical trials has yet to receive an adequate moral analysis.Dickert and Grady argue for a wage payment model in whichresearch subjects are paid an hourly wage based on that ofunskilled laborers. If we accept this approach, what follows?Norms for just working conditions emerge from workplacelegislation and political theory. All workers, includingpaid research subjects under Dickert and Grady''s analysis,have a right to at least minimum wage, a standard work week,extra pay for overtime hours, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   21 citations  
  • An ethical framework for the practice of paying research subjects.Terrence F. Ackerman - 1988 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 11 (4):1-4.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   16 citations  
  • (1 other version)Paying People to Participate in Research: Why not?McNeill Paul - 2002 - Bioethics 11 (5):390-396.
    This paper argues against paying people to participate in research. Volunteering to participate as a subject in a research program is not like taking a job. The main difference is to do with the risks inherent in research. Experimentation on human beings is, by definition, trying out something with an unknown consequence and exposes people to risks of harm which cannot be known in advance. This is the main reason for independent review by committee of research programs. It is based (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  • The Paradoxical Case of Payment as Benefit to Research Subjects.Ruth Macklin - 1989 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 11 (6):1.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   21 citations  
  • Undue Inducement: Nonsense on Stilts?Ezekiel J. Emanuel - 2005 - American Journal of Bioethics 5 (5):9-13.
    1. The opinions expressed are the author's own. They do not reflect any position or policy of the National Institutes of Health, Public Health Service, Department of Health and Human Services, or any of the authors affiliated organizations.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   50 citations