Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Domain-general and Domain-specific Patterns of Activity Support Metacognition in Human Prefrontal Cortex.Jorge Morales, Hakwan Lau & Stephen M. Fleming - 2018 - The Journal of Neuroscience 38 (14):3534-3546.
    Metacognition is the capacity to evaluate the success of one's own cognitive processes in various domains; for example, memory and perception. It remains controversial whether metacognition relies on a domain-general resource that is applied to different tasks or if self-evaluative processes are domain specific. Here, we investigated this issue directly by examining the neural substrates engaged when metacognitive judgments were made by human participants of both sexes during perceptual and memory tasks matched for stimulus and performance characteristics. By comparing patterns (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  • Suboptimality in perceptual decision making.Dobromir Rahnev & Rachel N. Denison - 2018 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 41:1-107.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   31 citations  
  • A signal detection theoretic approach for estimating metacognitive sensitivity from confidence ratings.Brian Maniscalco & Hakwan Lau - 2012 - Consciousness and Cognition 21 (1):422-430.
    How should we measure metacognitive sensitivity, i.e. the efficacy with which observers’ confidence ratings discriminate between their own correct and incorrect stimulus classifications? We argue that currently available methods are inadequate because they are influenced by factors such as response bias and type 1 sensitivity . Extending the signal detection theory approach of Galvin, Podd, Drga, and Whitmore , we propose a method of measuring type 2 sensitivity that is free from these confounds. We call our measure meta-d′, which reflects (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   78 citations  
  • Confirmation bias without rhyme or reason.Matthias Michel & Megan A. K. Peters - 2020 - Synthese 199 (1-2):2757-2772.
    Having a confirmation bias sometimes leads us to hold inaccurate beliefs. So, the puzzle goes: why do we have it? According to the influential argumentative theory of reasoning, confirmation bias emerges because the primary function of reason is not to form accurate beliefs, but to convince others that we’re right. A crucial prediction of the theory, then, is that confirmation bias should be found only in the reasoning domain. In this article, we argue that there is evidence that confirmation bias (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • How to measure metacognition.Stephen M. Fleming & Hakwan C. Lau - 2014 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   87 citations  
  • Two-stage dynamic signal detection: A theory of choice, decision time, and confidence.Timothy J. Pleskac & Jerome R. Busemeyer - 2010 - Psychological Review 117 (3):864-901.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   64 citations  
  • Domain-specific and domain-general processes underlying metacognitive judgments.Lisa M. Fitzgerald, Mahnaz Arvaneh & Paul M. Dockree - 2017 - Consciousness and Cognition 49:264-277.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Prestimulus alpha-band power biases visual discrimination confidence, but not accuracy.Jason Samaha, Luca Iemi & Bradley R. Postle - 2017 - Consciousness and Cognition 54:47-55.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  • Dissociating Perceptual Confidence from Discrimination Accuracy Reveals No Influence of Metacognitive Awareness on Working Memory.Jason Samaha, John J. Barrett, Andrew D. Sheldon, Joshua J. LaRocque & Bradley R. Postle - 2016 - Frontiers in Psychology 7.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations  
  • A decision-congruent heuristic gives superior metacognitive sensitivity under realistic variance assumptions.Kiyofumi Miyoshi & Hakwan Lau - 2020 - Psychological Review 127 (5):655-671.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations