Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. A New Threat to Pregnant Women's Autonomy.Dawn Johnsen - 1987 - Hastings Center Report 17 (4):33-40.
    Courts and legislatures are increasingly being called upon to restrict the autonomy of pregnant women by requiring them to behave in ways that others determine are best for the fetuses they carry. The state should not attempt to transform pregnant women into ideal baby‐making machines. Pregnant women make decisions about their behavior in the context of the rest of their lives, with all the attendant complexities and pressures. Our interest in helping future children by improving prenatal care would best be (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • A Realistic Approach to Maternal‐Fetal Conflict.Deborah Hornstra - 1998 - Hastings Center Report 28 (5):7-12.
    We should not think of babies as having a right to be born healthy. We cannot say what such a right involves, and if we could, enforcing it would infringe on the mother's most basic rights. Most importantly, positing such a right casts the fetus and mother as adversaries, and so destroys the maternal‐fetal relationship.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • (1 other version)Reasons and Persons.Joseph Margolis - 1986 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 47 (2):311-327.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1638 citations  
  • Practical Ethics.John Martin Fischer - 1983 - Philosophical Review 92 (2):264.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   376 citations  
  • Abortion and Infanticide.Nancy Davis - 1985 - Philosophical Review 94 (3):436.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   70 citations  
  • Animal Liberation.Bill Puka & Peter Singer - 1977 - Philosophical Review 86 (4):557.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   612 citations  
  • [Book review] children of choice, freedom and the new reproductive technologies. [REVIEW]Laura M. Purdy - 1996 - Criminal Justice Ethics 15 (1):67-74.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   103 citations  
  • (1 other version)A defense of abortion.Judith Jarvis Thomson - 1971 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 1 (1):47-66.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   651 citations  
  • Women, forced caesareans and antenatal responsibilities.H. Draper - 1996 - Journal of Medical Ethics 22 (6):327-333.
    In the UK in October 1992, Mrs S was forced to have a caesarean section despite her objections to such a procedure on religious grounds. The case once again called into question the obligations of women to the unborn, and also whether one person can be forced to undergo a medical procedure for the benefit of someone else. Re S, like the case of Angela Carder, is often discussed in terms of the conflict between maternal and fetal rights. This paper (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  • Law and the Life Sciences: Forced Cesareans: The Most Unkindest Cut of All.George J. Annas - 1982 - Hastings Center Report 12 (3):16.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  • At Law: Pregnant Women as Fetal Containers.George J. Annas - 1986 - Hastings Center Report 16 (6):13.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   20 citations  
  • AT LAW: She's Going to Die: The Case of Angela C.George J. Annas - 1988 - Hastings Center Report 18 (1):23-25.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  • At Law: Foreclosing the Use of Force: A. C. Reversed.George J. Annas - 1990 - Hastings Center Report 20 (4):27.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • (3 other versions)Theory of Justice.John Rawls - 1972 - Journal of Philosophy 69 (18):556-557.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   224 citations  
  • When becoming pregnant is a crime.Lynn M. Paltrow - 1990 - Criminal Justice Ethics 9 (1):41-47.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • The Possibility of Altruism.John Benson - 1972 - Philosophical Quarterly 22 (86):82-83.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   282 citations  
  • The pregnant woman and the good samaritan: Can a woman have a duty to undergo a caesarean section?Scott Rosamund - 2000 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 20 (3):407-436.
    Although a pregnant woman can now refuse any medical treatment needed by the fetus, the Court of Appeal has acknowledged that ethical dilemmas remain, adverting to the inappropriateness of legal compulsion of presumed moral duties in this context. This leaves the impression of an uncomfortable split between the ethics and the law. The notion of a pregnant woman refusing medical treatment needed by the fetus is troubling and it helps little simply to assert that she has a legal right to (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • (1 other version)Cesareans and Samaritans.Nancy K. Rhoden - 1987 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 15 (3):118-125.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • (1 other version)Cesareans and Samaritans.Nancy K. Rhoden - 1987 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 15 (3):118-125.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations