Acknowledgments THROUGHOUT this book I cite the many people who have provided information on individual programs and activities. ...

In der Geschichte des künstlerischen, technischen und architektonischen Entwerfens wurde das Zeichnen weitgehend mit bestimmten Projektionstechniken identifiziert. Allerdings dürfte sich die eigentlich generative Kraft des Zeichnens schwerlich auf den Stabilisierungs- und Übertragungsvorgang beschränken lassen. Wo gezeichnet wird, wird auch überzeichnet, durchgestrichen, neu begonnen, also: immer weiter gezeichnet. Worin besteht nun also die Leistung des Zeichnens als Werkzeug des Entwurfs? In the history of artistic, technical and architectonical design, drawing has largely been identified with certain techniques of projection. However, the actual (...) productive potency of drawing can hardly be reduced to an act of stabilization and transferal. Drawing also means to draw over, to cross out, to start anew, and therefore: to keep drawing. What is, then, the benefit of drawing as a tool for designing? (shrink)

ABSTRACT An overview of some of the main modes of making images of natural objects and processes, as they have appeared in the history of science, leads to two main conclusions. First, the dichotomies that have traditionally distinguished, for example, art from science, museums from laboratories, and geometrical from algebraic methods have produced a poverty of understanding of visualization. It is at the intersections of these dichotomies where much of the creative work of science occurs, and it is into those (...) intersections that this Focus section leads us. Second, the section suggests that we need to understand images as arguments. Generalizing, we need to develop a “materialized epistemology” that reunites sensual with ideational knowing. Recent work in the history of science is already pointing the way and producing a dramatically new historiography. (shrink)