Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. What is the developmentalist challenge?Paul E. Griffiths & Robin D. Knight - 1998 - Philosophy of Science 65 (2):253-258.
    Kenneth C. Schaffner's paper is an important contribution to the literature on behavioral genetics and on genetics in general. Schaffner has a long record of injecting real molecular biology into philosophical discussions of genetics. His treatments of the reduction of Mendelian to molecular genetics first drew philosophical attention to the problems of detail that have fuelled both anti-reductionism and more sophisticated models of theory reduction. An injection of molecular detail into discussions of genetics is particularly necessary at the present time, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   61 citations  
  • Discovery and Explanation in Biology and Medicine.Kenneth F. Schaffner - 1995 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 46 (4):621-623.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   158 citations  
  • Wormwholes: A commentary on K. F. Schaffner's "genes, behavior, and developmental emergentism".Scott F. Gilbert & Erik M. Jorgensen - 1998 - Philosophy of Science 65 (2):259-266.
    Although Caenorhabditis elegans was chosen and modified to be an organism that would facilitate a reductionist program for neurogenetics, recent research has provided evidence for properties that are emergent from the neurons. While neurogenetic advances have been made using C. elegans which may be useful in explaining human neurobiology, there are severe limitations on C. elegans to explain any significant human behavior.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Simple systems and phylogenetic diversity.William C. Wimsatt - 1998 - Philosophy of Science 65 (2):267-275.
    The simple systems methodology is a powerful reductionistic research strategy. It has problems as implemented in developmental genetics because the organisms studied are few and unrepresentative. Stronger inferences require independent arguments that key traits are widely distributed phylogenetically. Evolutionary and developmental mechanisms of generative entrenchment and self-organization provide possible support, and are also necessary components of a developmental systems approach.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • Theory structure in the biomedical sciences.Kenneth F. Schaffner - 1980 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 5 (1):57-97.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   25 citations  
  • Exemplar reasoning about biological models and diseases: A relation between the philosophy of medicine and philosophy of science.Kenneth F. Schaffner - 1986 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 11 (1):63-80.
    the structure of medical science with a special focus on the role of generalizations and universals in medicine, and (2) philosophy of medicine's relation with the philosophy of science. I argue that a usually overlooked aspect of Kuhnian paradigms, namely, their characteristic of being "exemplars", is of considerable significance in the biomedical sciences. This significance rests on certain important differences from the physical sciences in the nature of theories in the basic and the clinical medical sciences. I describe those differences (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   16 citations