Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Health: The Foundations for Achievement.David Seedhouse - 2001 - Wiley.
    This inspirational book provides the philosophical backbone tocountless courses for health professionals. It poses twofundamental questions - "What is health?" and "How can more healthbe achieved?" - and answers them at a depth unmatched by any othertext in this field. David Seedhouse shows that these questions lieat the heart of health practice, and explains why all healthworkers should ponder them deeply. This second edition retains the freshness and enthusiasm of thefirst, while making the foundations theory and its practicalapplications clearer and (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   31 citations  
  • (1 other version)Ethics: The Heart of Health Care.David Seedhouse - 1988 - New York: Wiley.
    Ethics: The Heart of Health Care - a classic ethics text in medical, health and nursing studies - is recommended around the globe for its straightforward introduction to ethical analysis. In this new edition David Seedhouse demonstrates tangibly and graphically how ethics and health care are inextricably bound together, and creates a firm theoretical basis for practical decision-making. He not only clarifies ethics but, with the aid of the acclaimed Ethical Grid, teaches an essential practical skill which can be productively (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   34 citations  
  • Opioids for chronic pain of non-malignant origin—Caring or crippling.Robert G. Large & Stephan A. Schug - 1995 - Health Care Analysis 3 (1):5-11.
    Pain management has improved in the past few decades. Opioid analgesics have become the mainstay in the treatment of cancer pain whilst inter-disciplinary pain management programmes are the generally accepted approach to chronic pain of non-malignant origin. Recently some pain specialists have advocated the use of opioids in the long-term management of non-cancer pain. This has raised some fundamental questions about the purpose of pain management. Is it best to opt for maximum pain relief and comfort, or should one emphasise (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Analysing ethics.Brian Stoffell - 1994 - Health Care Analysis 2 (4):306-309.
    I cannot be certain what people have in mind when they wish to expose medical students to ethics, but if what I have said so far is sound, then they ought not to mean moral philosophy alone. The moral life of medicine and the moral life in general have certainly given rise to rules of thumb, guidelines and principles which summarise our sentiments about interactions within that life. However, the substance of that life is human vulnerability and our responses to (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Liberating Medicine.David Seedhouse - 1991 - John Wiley & Son.
    Liberating Medicine David Seedhouse Unit for the Study of Health Care Ethics, Department of General Practice, University of Liverpool, UK Amid the increasing debate about the practice of medicine and the delivery of health care lie certain fundamental questions: What is the purpose of medicine? What is the role of the medical profession? and Where should the limits of medical intervention be set? In a world of rapid scientific and technological advance, public expectations place increasing demands on the doctor’s skills, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  • Opioids for chronic pain of non-malignant origin: Panacea, palliation or pandora's box? [REVIEW]Robert G. Large & Stephan A. Schug - 1995 - Health Care Analysis 3 (4):350-352.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Opioids for chronic pain of non-malignant origin—Coercion or consent?Margaret A. Somerville - 1995 - Health Care Analysis 3 (1):12-14.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Bioethical blind spots: Four flaws in the field of view of traditional bioethics. [REVIEW]K. W. M. Fulford - 1993 - Health Care Analysis 1 (2):155-162.
    In this paper it is argued that bioethics has tended to emphasise: ‘high tech’ areas of medicine at the expense of ‘low tech’ areas such as psychiatry; problems arising in treatment at the expense of those associated with diagnosis; questions of fact at the expense of questions of value; and applied ethics at the expense of philosophical theory. The common factor linking these four ‘bioethical blind spots’ is a failute to recognise the full extent to which medicine is an ethical (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations