- Submit
-
Browse
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- More
Switch to: Citations
References in:
Add references
You must login to add references.
|
|
|
Since at least the advent of Jack Kevorkian’s “suicide machine” the major argument against adopting physician-assisted suicide laws has been that they will lead us down a slippery slope to state-sa... |
|
|
Shavelson et al., argues that California’s End of Life Option Act (ELOA) violates the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), because the ELOA requires the patient to “self-administer” their prescri... |
|
|
Shavelson et al. (2023) identify an important problem in their Target article: a significant number of terminally ill patients with impaired motor function are wrongfully excluded from receiving ai... |
|
|
Bioethical concerns about the potential for abuse in medical aid in dying (MAID) have focused primarily on the risk of coercion (Battin et al. 2007; Foley and Hendin 2002). Accordingly, the require... |
|
|
In 2015, in preparation for implementation of the California End of Life Option Act, the UCLA Workgroup dedicated scores of hours to exploring the ethical underpinnings of aid-in-dying and the guid... |
|
|
In their forthcoming article, Shavelson and colleagues (2023) identify a key ethical concern associated with medical aid-in-dying (MAiD) laws in the eleven US jurisdictions where the practice is le... |
|
|
As Shavelson et al. (2023) demonstrate with their example of Imani, the lines drawn between permissible and impermissible aid in dying can seem arbitrary, discriminatory, and inconsistent with the... |
|
|
Why would we prohibit people with disabilities from receiving the assistance needed to achieve similar goals as people without disabilities? On its face, this would seem to be a discriminatory appr... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7f8ff5d46-lkplx uwo