Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. (1 other version)What counts as an Individual for Spinoza?Steven Barbone - 2002 - In Olli Koistinen & John Ivan Biro (eds.), Spinoza: Metaphysical Themes. New York: Oup Usa. pp. 89-112.
    Very close analysis of Baruch Spinoza's wording in describing individuals rather than things. Individuals, but not collections such as a political state or club, each have their own specific conatus, or essence. Collectivities, like nations or institutions, fail to meet this necessary condition of individuation.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   24 citations  
  • Political Power and Depoliticised Acquiescence: Spinoza and Aristocracy.Sandra Leonie Field - 2020 - Constellations 27 (4):670-684.
    According to a recent interpretive orthodoxy, Spinoza is a profoundly democratic theorist of state authority. I reject this orthodoxy. To be sure, for Spinoza, a political order succeeds in proportion as it harnesses the power of the people within it. However, Spinoza shows that political inclusion is only one possible strategy to this end; equally if not more useful is political exclusion, so long as it maintains what I call the depoliticised acquiescence of those excluded.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Natural and unnatural communities: Spinoza beyond Hobbes.Aurelia Armstrong - 2009 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 17 (2):279-305.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations