Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. The Dialectical Forge: Juridical Disputation and the Evolution of Islamic Law.Walter Edward Young - 2016 - Cham, Switzerland: Springer Verlag.
    The Dialectical Forge identifies dialectical disputation as a primary formative dynamic in the evolution of pre-modern Islamic legal systems, promoting dialectic from relative obscurity to a more appropriate position at the forefront of Islamic legal studies. The author introduces and develops a dialectics-based analytical method for the study of pre-modern Islamic legal argumentation, examines parallels and divergences between Aristotelian dialectic and early juridical jadal-theory, and proposes a multi-component paradigm—the Dialectical Forge Model—to account for the power of jadal in shaping Islamic (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • A Post-ghazālian Critic Of Avicenna: Ibn Ghaylān al-Balkhī on the Materia Medica of the Canon of Medicine.Ayman Shihadeh - 2013 - Journal of Islamic Studies 24 (2):135-174.
    This article sheds new light on the sixth/twelfth-century anti-Avicennan current, which took its cue primarily from al-Ghazālī’s Incoherence of the Philosophers . A key representative of this current, Ibn Ghaylān al-Balkhī , veers away from the usual points of conflict in metaphysics and natural philosophy, directing his attention instead to descriptions of the properties of simple drugs in Avicenna's Canon of Medicine and Heart Remedies and Ismāʿīl al-Jurjānī's medical encyclopaedia The Khwārazmshāhī Treasure . In a dedicated text, he highlights various (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Avicenna on the Nature of Mathematical Objects.Mohammad Saleh Zarepour - 2016 - Dialogue 55 (3):511-536.
    Some authors have proposed that Avicenna considers mathematical objects, i.e., geometric shapes and numbers, to be mental existents completely separated from matter. In this paper, I will show that this description, though not completely wrong, is misleading. Avicenna endorses, I will argue, some sort of literalism, potentialism, and finitism.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • The argument from ignorance and its critics in medieval arabic thought.Ayman Shihadeh - 2013 - Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 23 (2):171-220.
    The earliest debate on the argument from ignorance emerged in Islamic rational theology around the fourth/tenth century, approximately seven centuries before John Locke identified it as a distinct type of argument. The most influential defences of the epistemological principle that are encountered in Mu sources, particularly r and al-Malimar, and was eventually classed as a fallacy by Fakhr al-Dzyat al-l contains the most definitive and comprehensive refutation of classical kalm summa. According to the eighth/fourteenth-century historian Ibn Khaldarism took during the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations